skip to main content
article
Free Access

Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality?

Published:01 July 1986Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Although many informal surveys in the business press have contended that computer anxiety has a significant adverse impact on managers' willingness to use microcomputers, the problem is neither as extensive nor as severe as once believed.

References

  1. 1 Bander. R.S. Russell. R.K., and Zamostony, K.P. A comparison of cue-controlled relaxation and study skills counseling in the treatment of mathematics anxiety. I. Educ. Psychol. 74 (1962). 96-103.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Barkin. S. An investigation into some factors affecting information system utilization. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Management, Univ. of Minnesota. Minneapolis, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Bralove. M. Computer anxiety hits middle management. Wall Sf. 1. (Mar. 29. 1983).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Coli. S. New category of phobics fears computers. Reprinted in Akron Beacon J. (Jan. 6. 1986). B5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Fennema. E. and Sherman. J.A. Fennema-Sherman mathematics attitude scale. instruments. /. Res. Math. Educ. 12 (1961). 3-4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Helmstadler. G.C. Principles of Psychological MeasuremenL Appleton- Century-Crofts. New York, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Howard, G.S. Measurement of managers' attitudes toward the usefulness of microcomputers. In 1985 Proceedings. American Institute for Decision Sciences. Las Vegas, Nevada, 1985. pp. 353-355.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Howard, G.S. Computer Amiefy and fhe Use of Microcompufers in Managemenf. University Microfilms International. Ann Arbor, Mich., 1986.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 James, F. Got vertigo cwer video displays? Maybe it's a case of cyberphobia. Wall St. 1. (June 8, 1982). 37.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Linn. R.L. and Slinde. J.A. The determination of the significance of change between pre and posttesting periods. Rev. Educ. Res. 47 (1977). 121-150.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 Meichenbaum. D.H. Cognitive-Behavior Modificafion: An lnfegrafiue Approach. Plenum, New York. 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Paul, L. Research on cyberphiliacs and cyberphobiacs reveals 30% of workers fear computers. Compufenuorld (Apr. 5. 1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Raub. A.C. Correlates of computer anxiety in college students. Ph.D. dissertation, Univ. of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 Rout. L. Computer choler: Many managers resist. Wall Sf. J. (lune 24. 1982). 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 Shaffer. R.A. As professional and business interest in personal computers swells Wall Sf. /. (Oct. 8, 1982). 35.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 Spielberger. C.D. Gorsuch. R.L. and Lushene. R.E. Sfafe-Traif Anxiety Invenfory Mar~ual. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, Calif. 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 Valecha. G.K. and Ostrom, T.M. An abbreviated measure of internal-external locus of control. 1. Pers. Assess. 38 (1974). 369-376.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 Weinberg, S.B. and English, J.T. Correlates of cyberphobia. St. Joseph's Univ. Philadelphia, Pa., 1983. Unpublished paper.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 Weinberg, S.B., English, J.T. and Mend, C.J. A strategem for reduction of cyberphobia. In Proceedings of fhe AAAS Convenfion. 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 Zemke. R. Exxon finds fear a fiction. Training (June 1984). 41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality?

            Recommendations

            Reviews

            Ernest A Kallman

            This work presents some significant conclusions on a topic of importance to anyone faced with implementing computer technology in organizations. The effort builds on past research, uses sound methodology, and its presentation is understandable and well organized. The authors respond to three major questions: (1)Is computer anxiety a real or imagined problem__ __ (Their conclusion is that it is less real than once thought.) (2)What is the nature of computer anxiety__ __ (They respond to ten common beliefs. Especially important were results that showed neither age nor sex correlated significantly with computer anxiety, that high levels of math anxiety accompanied high levels of computer anxiety, and the relationship of computer anxiety with computer knowledge was not significant. This latter finding led to the conclusion that actual hands-on experience is what is needed.) (3)Can computer anxiety be treated__ __ (They conclude yes, and explain how this might happen when the anxiety has either psychological, educational, or operational roots.)

            Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

            Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            Full Access

            • Published in

              cover image Communications of the ACM
              Communications of the ACM  Volume 29, Issue 7
              July 1986
              103 pages
              ISSN:0001-0782
              EISSN:1557-7317
              DOI:10.1145/6138
              Issue’s Table of Contents

              Copyright © 1986 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 1 July 1986

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • article

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader