ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Scalable application layer multicast
Full text pdf formatPdf (562 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the 2002 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
SESSION: P2P and multicast table of contents
Pages: 205 - 217  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-570-X
Also published in ...
Authors
Suman Banerjee  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Bobby Bhattacharjee  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Christopher Kommareddy  University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 33,   Downloads (12 Months): 190,   Citation Count: 110
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/633025.633045
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We describe a new scalable application-layer multicast protocol, specifically designed for low-bandwidth, data streaming applications with large receiver sets. Our scheme is based upon a hierarchical clustering of the application-layer multicast peers and can support a number of different data delivery trees with desirable properties.We present extensive simulations of both our protocol and the Narada application-layer multicast protocol over Internet-like topologies. Our results show that for groups of size 32 or more, our protocol has lower link stress (by about 25%), improved or similar end-to-end latencies and similar failure recovery properties. More importantly, it is able to achieve these results by using orders of magnitude lower control traffic.Finally, we present results from our wide-area testbed in which we experimented with 32-100 member groups distributed over 8 different sites. In our experiments, average group members established and maintained low-latency paths and incurred a maximum packet loss rate of less than 1% as members randomly joined and left the multicast group. The average control overhead during our experiments was less than 1 Kbps for groups of size 100.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
T. Ballardie, P. Francis, and J. Crowcroft. Core Based Trees (CBT): An Architecture for Scalable Multicast Routing. In Proceedings of ACM Sigcomm, 1995.
 
3
 
4
S. Banerjee, B. Bhattacharjee, and C. Kommareddy. Scalable application layer multicast. Technical report, UMIACS TR-2002-53 and CS-TR 4373, Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA, May 2002.
 
5
K. Calvert, E. Zegura, and S. Bhattacharjee. How to Model an Internetwork. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 1996.
 
6
M. Castro, P. Druschel, A.-M. Kermarrec, and A. Rowstron. SCRIBE: A large-scale and decentralized application-level multicast infrastructure. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in communications (JSAC), 2002. To appear.
 
7
 
8
Y. Chawathe, S. McCanne, and E. A. Brewer. RMX: Reliable Multicast for Heterogeneous Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2000.
9
10
11
 
12
P. Francis. Yoid: Extending the Multicast Internet Architecture, 1999. White paper http://www.aciri.org/yoid/.
 
13
 
14
J. Jannotti, D. Gifford, K. Johnson, M. Kaashoek, and J. O'Toole. Overcast: Reliable Multicasting with an Overlay Network. In Proceedings of the 4th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, Oct. 2000.
 
15
D. Pendarakis, S. Shi, D. Verma, and M. Waldvogel. ALMI: An Application Level Multicast Infrastructure. In Proceedings of 3rd Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies & Systems, March 2001.
16
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
B. Zhang, S. Jamin, and L. Zhang. Host multicast: A framework for delivering multicast to end users. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, June 2002.
 
23
24

CITED BY  110
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Suman Banerjee: colleagues
Bobby Bhattacharjee: colleagues
Christopher Kommareddy: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: