skip to main content
article

Principles of survey research part 6: data analysis

Published:01 March 2003Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This article is the last of our series of articles on survey research. In it, we discuss how to analyze survey data. We provide examples of correct and incorrect analysis techniques used in software engineering surveys.

References

  1. L. J. Cronbach, Coefficient alpha and internal structure of tests, Psychometrika, 16(2), 1951, pp. 297--334.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. G. Keppel. Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook, third edition, Prentice Hall, 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbara A. Kitchenham, Shari Lawrence Pfleeger, Lesley M. Pickard, Peter W. Jones, David C. Hoaglin, Khaled El Emam, and Jarrett Rosenberg. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. Accepted for publication Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Timothy Lethbridge, A survey of the relevance of computer science and software engineering education, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Computer Society Press, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Timothy Lethbridge, What knowledge is important to a software professional, IEEE Computer, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. P. S. Levy and S. Lemeshow, Sampling and Populations, Third Edition, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. R. J. A. Little and D. B. Rubin, Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, Wiley, New York, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. J. Moses, Bayesian probability distributions for assessing measurement of subjective software attributes, Information and Software Technology, 42(8), 2000, pp 533--546.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. J. Ropponen and K. Lyytinen, Components of software development risk: How to address them. A project manager survey, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(2), February 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. W. F. Rosenberger, Dealing with multiplicities in pharmacoepidemiologic studies, Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 5, 1996, pp. 95--100.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. S. Siegel and N. J. Castellan, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, N.Y., 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes
    ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes  Volume 28, Issue 2
    March 2003
    158 pages
    ISSN:0163-5948
    DOI:10.1145/638750
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2003 Authors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 March 2003

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader