skip to main content
10.1145/641007.641077acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Leveraging non-relevant images to enhance image retrieval performance

Published:01 December 2002Publication History

ABSTRACT

Inherent subjectivity in user's perception of an image has motivated the use of relevance feedback (RF) in the image desigined output's retrieval process. RF techniques interactively determine the user's query concept, given the user's relevance judgments on a set of images. In this paper we propose a robust technique that utilizes non-relevant images to efficiently discover the relevant search region. A similarity metric, estimated using the relevant images is then used to rank and retrieve database images in the relevant region. The partitioning of the feature space is achieved by using a piecewise linear decision surface that separates the relevant and non-relevant images. Each of the hyperplanes constituting the decision surface is normal to the minimum distance vector from a non-relevant point to the convex hull of relevant points. Experimental results demonstrate significant improvement in retrieval performance for the small feedback size scenario over two well established RF algorithms.

References

  1. Y. Rui, T. S. Huang, and S. Mehrotra. Content-based image retrieval with relevance feedback in MARS. Proc. Int'l Conf. on Image Processing, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. X. S. Zhou and T. S. Huang. Exploring the nature and variants of relevance feedback. Proc. IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, Hawaii, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Y. Ishikawa, R. Subramanya, and C. Faloustos. MindReader: Query databases through multiple examples. Proc. VLDB Conf., New York, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. X. S. Zhou and T. S. Huang. Small sample learning during multimedia retrieval using BiasMap. Proc. IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Hawaii, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. S. Tong and E. Chang. Support vector machine active learning for image retrieval. Proc. ACM Multimedia, Ottawa, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ashwin T. V., Rahul Gupta, and Sugata Ghosal. Adaptable similarity search using non-relevant information. Proc. VLDB Conf., Hong Kong, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. David G. Luenberger. Introduction to linear and non-linear programming, pp. 262--270. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ashwin T. V., Rahul Gupta, and Sugata Ghosal. Leveraging non-relevant images to enhance image retrieval performance. IBM Research Report, RI02022, http://www.research.ibm.com/resources/paper_search.shtml, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. T. Joachims. SV Mlight, http://svmlight.joachims.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    MULTIMEDIA '02: Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on Multimedia
    December 2002
    683 pages
    ISBN:158113620X
    DOI:10.1145/641007

    Copyright © 2002 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 December 2002

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    MULTIMEDIA '02 Paper Acceptance Rate46of330submissions,14%Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

    Upcoming Conference

    MM '24
    MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
    October 28 - November 1, 2024
    Melbourne , VIC , Australia
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader