skip to main content
10.1145/642611.642698acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Repairing usability problems identified by the cognitive walkthrough for the web

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 April 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Methods for identifying usability problems in web page designs should ideally also provide practical methods for repairing the problems found. Blackmon et al. [2] proved the usefulness of the Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web (CWW) for identifying three types of problems that interfere with users' navigation and information search tasks. Extending that work, this paper reports a series of two experiments that develop and prove the effectiveness of both full-scale and quick-fix CWW repair methods. CWW repairs, like CWW problem identification, use Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) to objectively estimate the degree of semantic similarity (information scent) between representative user goal statements (100-200 words) and heading/link texts on each web page. In addition to proving the effectiveness of CWW repairs, the experiments reported here replicate CWW predictions that users will face serious difficulties if web developers fail to repair the usability problems that CWW identifies in web page designs [2].

References

  1. Berland, G.K. at al. Health information on the Internet: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2612--2621, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Blackmon, M. H., Polson, P. G., Kitajima, M., & Lewis, C. Cognitive Walkthrough for the Web. Proceedings of CHI 2002, ACM Press, 463--470, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Chi, E., Pirolli, P., & Pitkow, J. The scent of a site: A system for analyzing and predicting information scent, usage, and usability of a website. In Proceedings of CHI 2000, 161--168, ACM Press, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Chi, E., Pirolli, P., Chen, K., & Pitkow, J. Using information scent to model user information needs and actions and the Web. In Proceedings of CHI 2001, ACM Press, 490--497, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Furnas, G. W. Effective view navigation. In Proceedings of CHI'97, ACM Press, 367--374, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Katz, M. A., & Byrne, M. D. Searching and browsing on e-commerce sites: Frequency, efficiency, and rationale. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Kintsch, W. Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition, Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Kitajima, M. & Polson, P. G. A comprehension-based model of exploration, Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 345--389, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kitajima, M., Blackmon, M. H., & Polson, P. G. A Comprehension-based model of Web navigation and its application to Web usability analysis. In People and Computers XIV, Springer, 357--373, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Landauer, T. K. & Dumais, S. T. A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104, 211--240, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Larson, K., & Czerwinski, M. Web page design: Implications of memory, structure and scent for information retrieval. In Proceedings of CHI'98, ACM Press, 25--32, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nielsen, J. & Mack, R. L. Usability Inspection Methods, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Nielsen, J. Designing Web Usability, New Riders Publishing, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pirolli, P. & Card, S. Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106, 643--675, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Wharton, C., Rieman, J., Lewis, C., & Polson, P. The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack (Eds.), Usability Inspection Methods, New York: John Wiley, 105--140, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Vanderdonckt, J. Development milestones towards a tool for working with guidelines. Interacting with Computers, 12, 81--118.1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Repairing usability problems identified by the cognitive walkthrough for the web

                Recommendations

                Comments

                Login options

                Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                Sign in
                • Published in

                  cover image ACM Conferences
                  CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                  April 2003
                  620 pages
                  ISBN:1581136307
                  DOI:10.1145/642611

                  Copyright © 2003 ACM

                  Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                  Publisher

                  Association for Computing Machinery

                  New York, NY, United States

                  Publication History

                  • Published: 5 April 2003

                  Permissions

                  Request permissions about this article.

                  Request Permissions

                  Check for updates

                  Qualifiers

                  • Article

                  Acceptance Rates

                  CHI '03 Paper Acceptance Rate75of468submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

                  Upcoming Conference

                  CHI '24
                  CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
                  May 11 - 16, 2024
                  Honolulu , HI , USA

                PDF Format

                View or Download as a PDF file.

                PDF

                eReader

                View online with eReader.

                eReader