ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Anonymity and accountability in self-organizing electronic communities
Full text pdf formatPdf (356 KB)
Source Workshop On Privacy In The Electronic Society archive
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society table of contents
Washington, DC
Pages: 81 - 90  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:1-58113-633-1
Authors
Csilla Farkas  University of South Carolina, SC
Gábor Ziegler  Bp. Univ. of Techn. and Economics, Hungary
Attila Meretei  Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
András Lörincz  Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
Sponsor
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 113,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/644527.644536
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we study the problem of anonymity versus accountability in electronic communities. We argue that full anonymity may present a security risk that is unacceptable in certain applications; therefore, anonymity and accountability are both needed. To resolve the inherent contradiction between anonymity and accountability in a flexible manner, we introduce the concepts of internal and external accountabilities. Intuitively, internal accountability applies to virtual users only, and is governed by the policy of a group (a community). In contrast, external accountability is needed to address issues related to misuse if the activity is to be penalized in real life according to internal rules or external laws. We provide a set of protocols to ensure that users' virtual and real identities cannot be disclosed unnecessarily, and allow users to monitor the data collected about them as well as to terminate their membership (both real and virtual) under certain conditions. We develop a general conceptual model of electronic Editorial Board (e-EB). In our thinking, there are deep connections between anonymity and self-organization. In turn, the concept of self-organizing e-EB (SO-eEB) is introduced here, and a robotic example is provided. Finally, SO-eEB is specialized to Anonymous and Accountable Self-Organizing Communities (A2SOCs), that fully supports internal and external accountability while providing anonymity.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
A. Abdul-Rahman and S. Hailes. Relying on trust to find reliable information. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/348491.html, 2002.
 
2
 
3
K. Bennett, C.Grothoff, T. Horozov, I. Patrascu, and T. Stef. Gnunet --- a truly anonymous networking infrastructure. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/502472.html.
 
4
5
 
6
J. Claessens, B. Preneel, and J. Vandewalle. Anonymity controlled electronic payment systems. In Proc. 20th Symp. on Information Theory in the Benelux, 1999.
 
7
 
8
I. Clarke, O. Sandberg, B. Wiley, and T. W. Hong. Freenet: A distributed anonymous information storage and retrieval system. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 2009, 2001.
 
9
The freeweb project. http://freeweb.sourceforge.net/.
10
 
11
 
12
International standard iso 7498--1984 (e): Information technology -- open systems interconnection -- reference model -- part 1: Basic reference model.
 
13
 
14
I. Kókai and A. Lörincz. Fast adapting value estimation based hybrid architecture for searching the world-wide web. Applied Soft Computing, 28:1--13, 2002.
 
15
D. Kugler and H. Vogt. Off-line payments with auditable tracing. In Financial Cryptography, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
 
16
A. Lörincz, I. Kókai, and A. Meretei. Intelligent high-performance crawlers used to reveal topic-specific structure of the www. International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science, 13:477--495, 2002.
 
17
A. Lörincz, Z. Palotai, and S. Mandusitz. Efficient competition for news on the internet with minimized communication load. Manuscript in preparation, 2002.
 
18
 
19
D. Martin and A. Schulman. Deanonymizing users of the safeweb anonymizing service, Nov. 2002. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/martin02deanonymizing.html.
 
20
Napster. http://www.napster.com/about_us.html, 2002.
21
22
23
 
24
SourceForge.Net, the open source software development web site. http://www.sourceforge.net.
 
25
S. G. Stubblebine and P. F. Syverson. Authentic attributes with fine-grained anonymity protection. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, volume 1962, 2001.
 
26
K. Sycara and D. Zeng. Cooperative intelligent software agents. Technical Report Technical Report # CMU-RI-TR-95-14., Carnegie Mellons University, School of Computer Science, Robotics Institute, 1995. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/softagents/papers/pleiades-TR-95-14.pdf.
 
27
 
28
 
29
M. Venkatraman, B. Yu, and M. P. Singh. Trust and reputation management in a small-world network. http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/296051.html, 2002.
 
30
M. Waldman, A. D. Rubin, and L. F. Cranor. Publius: A robust, tamper-evident, censorship-resistant, web publishing system. In Proc. 9th USENIX Security Symposium, 2000.
 
31
 
32
G. Ziegler, C. Farkas, A. Meretei, and A. L őrincz. Privacy preserving accountability in electronic communities. Submitted to WWW2003, Budapest, Hungary, 2002.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Csilla Farkas: colleagues
Gábor Ziegler: colleagues
Attila Meretei: colleagues
András Lörincz: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: