R. Kleeper
- Albrecht, K., 1981, Function Points in Programming Productivity, IBM Systems Journal, November.Google Scholar
- American Productivity and Quality Center, 1986, Measuring White Collar Work, American Productivity and Quality Center, Corvallis, Oregon.Google Scholar
- Barrick, Murray R. and Alexander, Ralph A., 1987, A Review of Quality Circle Efficacy and the Existence of Positive-Findings Bias, Personnel Psychology, 40, pp. 579-592.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Berglind, Bradford L. and Scales, Charles D. 1987, White Collar Productivity, Management Review.Google Scholar
- Blair, John D. and Whitehead, Carlton J., 1984, Can Quality Circles Survive in the United States?, Business Horizons, September-October, pp. 17-23.Google Scholar
- Bradley, K. and Hill, S., 1983, After Japan, the Quality Circles Transplant and Productive Efficiency, British Journal of Industrial Relations, November, pp. 291- 311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cadotte, Ernest R., Woodruff, Robert B., and Jenkins, Roger L., 1987, Expectations and Norms in Models of Consumer Satisfaction, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XXIV (August), 305-314.Google Scholar
- Ferris, Gerald A. and Wagner, John A., 1985, Quality Circles in the United States: A Conceptual Reevaluation, Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 155-167.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hackman, J. Richard, 1986, The Psychology of Self-Management In Organizations, in M. S. Pallack and R. O. Perloff (eds.) Psychology and Work: Productivity, Change and Employment, Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Litecky, Charles R., 1988, A Review of Programming Productivity; Behavioral and Empirical Research, University of Missouri-Columbia, College of Business Working Paper - No. 89-5, Columbia, Missouri.Google Scholar
- Manz, C. C. and Sims, H. P., 1980, Self Management as a Substitute for Leadership: A Social Learning Theory Perspective, Academy of Management Review, vol. 5, pp. 361-367.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mohrman, Susan A. and Novelli, Luke, 1985, Beyond Testimonials, learning from a quality circles programme, Journal of Occupational Behavior, Vol. 6, 92-110.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Parasuraman, A., Zeithami, Valarie A., and Berry, Leonard L., 1985, A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49 (Fall), 41-50.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Pickler, Lee, 1983, Quality Circles in the Systems Environment, Journal of Systems Management, November.Google Scholar
- Rafaeli, Anat, 1985, Quality Circles and Employee Attitudes, Personnel Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 603- 615.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Klepper, Southern Illinois University, Chuck Litecky, University of Missouri-Columbia and Wendell Jones, McDonnell Douglas Corporation.Google Scholar
- Romer, Marlene, Olberding, Sara, and Pidwerbecki, W. Michael, 1987, Self-Managing Teams, The Quality Circles Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, September, p. 39.Google Scholar
- Shea, Gregory, 1986, Quality Circles: The Danger of Bottled Change, Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp. 33-46.Google Scholar
- Steel, Robert P., Mento, Anthony J., Dilla, Benjamin L., Ovalle, Nestor K., and Lloyd, Russell F., 1985, Factors Influencing the Success and Failure of Two Quality Circle Programs, Journal of Management, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 99-119.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wood, Robt, & Hull, Frank, & Azumi, Koya, 1983, Evaluating Quality Circles: The American Application, California Management Review, V. 26, no. 1, pp. 37-53.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Self managed teams and MIS productivity: literature, model and field study
Recommendations
Student leadership teams: does the benefit outweigh their egos?
SIGUCCS '06: Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM SIGUCCS fall conference: expanding the boundariesCreating and managing a team of students to help supervise other student staff has both positive and negative aspects. It is a necessity for those Information Technology (IT) departments who do not have enough full time staff to fulfill this role, yet ...
A Study on the Impact of Employee Retention Policies on Organisation Productivity in Private Sector
During the last decade, employee retention has become a most critical issue for all private sector organisations as a result of the shortage of skilled labor, economic growth and employee turnover. Retention of employees is an important function of the ...
Does the Unemployment Benefit Institution Affect the Productivity of Workers? Evidence from the Field
This paper studies the effects of unemployment benefit schemes on individual productivity. We created employment and unemployment in the field and compared workers’ productivity under no unemployment benefits to productivity under two different ...
Comments