Is IP going to take over the world (of communications)?

ABSTRACT

While it is technically pleasing to believe that IP will dominate all forms of communication, our delight in its elegance is making us overlook its shortcomings. IP is an excellent means to exchange data, which explains its success. It remains ill suited as a means to provide many other types of service; and is too crude to form the transport infrastructure in its own right. To allow the continued success of IP, we must be open-minded to it living alongside, and co-operating with other techniques (such as circuit switching) and protocols that are optimized to different needs. In this position paper, we question some of the folklore surrounding IP and packet switching. We conclude that while packet-switched IP will continue to dominate best-effort data services at the edge of the network, the core of the network will use optical circuit switching as a platform for multiple services.

REFERENCES

• 1: P. Baran. Introduction to distributed communications networks. Memorandum RM-3420-PR, Rand Corporation, Aug 1964.
• 2: D. J. Bishop, C. R. Giles, and G. P. Austin. The Lucent LambdaRouter: MEMS technology of the future here today. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(3):75--79, Mar 2002.
• 3: S. Blake, D. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. RFC 2475: An architecture for differentiated services, Dec. 1998.
• 4: R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker. RFC 1633: Integrated services in the Internet architecture: an overview, June 1994.
• 5: Cahners. 2001 business isps: Service, size, and share. advanced carrier business report. Report, Cahners, Oct 2001.
• 6: Cahners. Information alert newsletter. volume #23. Newsletter, Cahners, July 2001.
• 7: CAIDA, Cooperative Association for Internet Data Analysis. OC48 analysis summary: Distributions of traffic stratified by application, 2002.
• 8: Ciena. CIENA MultiWave CoreDirector, 2001.
• 9: K. G. Coffman , A. M. Odlyzko, Internet growth: is there a "Moore's law" for data traffic?, Handbook of massive data sets, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2002
• 10: C. Edwards. Panel weighs hardware, software design options. EE Times, June 2000.
• 11: D. Ferrari. Real-time communication in an internetwork. Journal of High Speed Networks IOS Press, 1(1):79--103, 1992.
• 12: C. Fraleigh. Provisioning IP Backbone Networks to Support Delay Sensitive Traffic. PhD thesis, Electrical Engineering Dept., Stanford University, 2002.
• 13: Industry Analysis Division, Common Carriers Bureau. Trends in telephone service. Report, US Federal Communications Commission, Aug 2001.
• 14: Juniper Networks. T640 Internet Routing Node: Datasheet, 2002.
• 15: D. Richard Kuhn, Sources of Failure in the Public Switched Telephone Network, Computer, v.30 n.4, p.31-36, April 1997 [doi>10.1109/2.585151 ]
• 16: Craig Labovitz , Abha Ahuja , Abhijit Bose , Farnam Jahanian, Delayed Internet routing convergence, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON), v.9 n.3, p.293-306, June 2001 [doi>10.1109/90.929852]
• 17: Craig Labovitz , Abha Ahuja , Farnam Jahanian, Experimental Study of Internet Stability and Backbone Failures, Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual International Symposium on Fault-Tolerant Computing, p.278, June 15-18, 1999
• 18: C. Labovitz, R. Wattenhofer, S. Venkatachary, and A. Ahuja. Resilience characteristics of the internet backbone routing infrastructure. In Proceedings of the Third Information Survivability Workshop, Boston, MA, October 2000.
• 19: Pablo Molinero-Fernández , Nick McKeown, TCP Switching: Exposing Circuits to IP, IEEE Micro, v.22 n.1, p.82-89, January 2002 [doi>10.1109/40.988693 ]
• 20: National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. Technical report, US Department of Commerce, 1999.
• 21: Nortel Networks. OPTera Connect HDX optical switch, 2002.
• 22: Nua Internet Surveys. How Many On-line?, April 2002.
• 23: M. O'Dell. Keynote speech. Sigcomm conference, August 2002.
• 24: Andrew Odlyzko, Data Networks Are Mostly Empty and for Good Reason, IT Professional, v.1 n.2, p.67-69, March 1999 [doi>10.1109/6294.774942 ]
• 25: A. Penenberg. The war for the poor. Forbes Magazine, 26 Sept 1997.
• 26: PMC-Sierra. Diagram of a 10 Gigabit Core Router Architecture, April 2002. http://www.pmc-sierra. com/products/diagrams/CoreRouter_lg.html.
• 27: PMC-Sierra. Diagram of a Sub-wavelength Optical Cross Connect, April 2002. http://www.pmc-sierra.com/products/diagrams/ SubWavelengthCrossConnect_l%g.html.
• 28: Private communication. Source requested not to be identified, April 2002.
• 29: RHK. North american telecom capex to turn up in 2004. Press release #154, RHK, April 2002.
• 30: RHK. Various industry reports and industry news, 2002. IN#114, IR#1101, IR#1102, IR#1079.
• 31: US Census. Industry quick report. Technical report, US Department of Commerce, 1997.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.1 Network Architecture and Design
          Subjects: Packet-switching networks

Additional Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.2 COMPUTER-COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
      C.2.1 Network Architecture and Design
          Subjects: Circuit-switching networks
      C.2.5 Local and Wide-Area Networks
          Subjects: Internet (e.g., TCP/IP)

Keywords:
IP, circuit switching, packet switching