ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An approach to engineer and enforce context constraints in an RBAC environment
Full text pdf formatPdf (378 KB)
Source Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies archive
Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies table of contents
Como, Italy
SESSION: Constraints table of contents
Pages: 65 - 79  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-681-1
Authors
Gustaf Neumann  Vienna University of Economics and BA, Austria
Mark Strembeck  Vienna University of Economics and BA, Austria
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 143,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/775412.775421
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an approach that uses special purpose RBAC constraints to base certain access control decisions on context information. In our approach a context constraint is defined as a dynamic RBAC constraint that checks the actual values of one or more contextual attributes for predefined conditions. If these conditions are satisfied, the corresponding access request can be permitted. Accordingly, a conditional permission is an RBAC permission which is constrained by one or more context constraints. We present an engineering process for context constraints, that is based on goal-oriented requirements engineering techniques, and describe how we extended the design and implementation of an existing RBAC service to enable the enforcement of context constraints. With our approach we aim to preserve the advantages of RBAC, and offer an additional means for the definition and enforcement of fine-grained context-dependent access control policies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
6
7
8
9
 
10
J. Clark and S. DeRose. XML Path Language (XPath). http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath, November 1999. W3 Consortium Recommendation.
11
12
 
13
14
15
 
16
17
18
19
20
21
 
22
M. Jarke, X.T. Bui, and J.M. Carroll. Scenario management: An interdisciplinary approach. Requirements Engineering Journal, 3(3/4), 1998.
23
 
24
25
26
 
27
G. Neumann and U. Zdun. XOTcl, an Object-Oriented Scripting Language. In Proc. of Tcl2k: 7th USENIX Tcl/Tk Conference, February 2000.
 
28
U. Nitsche, R. Holbein, O. Morger, and S. Teufel. Realization of a Context-Dependent Access Control Mechanism on a Commercial Platform. In Proc. of the 14th International Information Security Conference (IFIP/SEC), September 1998.
 
29
30
 
31
 
32
 
33
A. Schmidt, M. Beigl, and H.W. Gellersen. There is more to context than location. Computers & Graphics, Elsevier, 23(6), December 1999.
34
 
35
 
36
 
37
38
 
39
M. Weiser. The Computer for the 21st Century. Scientific American, 265(3), September 1991.
40
41


Collaborative Colleagues:
Gustaf Neumann: colleagues
Mark Strembeck: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: