ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
High-dimensional shape fitting in linear time
Full text PdfPdf (234 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Approximation table of contents
Pages: 39 - 47  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-663-3
Authors
Sariel Har-Peled  University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
Kasturi Varadarajan  University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/777792.777799
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Let P be a set of n points in Rd. The radius of a k-dimensional flat F with respect to P, denoted by RD(F,P), is defined to be maxp ? P dist(F,p), where dist(F,p) denotes the Euclidean distance between p and its projection onto F. The k-flat radius of P, which we denote by Rkopt(P), is the minimum, over all k-dimensional flats F, of RD(F,P). We consider the problem of computing Rkopt(P) for a given set of points P. We are interested in the high-dimensional case where d is a part of the input and not a constant. This problem is NP-hard even for k = 1. We present an algorithm that, given P and a parameter 0 < e = 1, returns a k-flat F such that RD(F,P) = (1 + e) Rkopt(P). The algorithm runs in O(nd Ce,k) time, where Ce,k is a constant that depends only on e and k. Thus the algorithm runs in time linear in the size of the point set and is a substantial improvement over previous known algorithms, whose running time is of the order of d nO(k/ec), where c is an appropriate constant.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Badoiu and K. L. Clarkson. Optimal core-sets for balls. In Proc. 14th ACM-SIAM Sympos. Discrete Algorithms, 801--802, 2003.
 
2
H. L. Bodlaender, P. Gritzmann, V. Klee, and J. van Leeuwen. The computational complexity of norm-maximization. Combinatorica, 10:203--225, 1990.
 
3
4
 
5
A. Brieden. On geometric optimization problems likely not contained in apx. to appear, 2002.
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
M. Grotschel, L. Lovasz, and A. Schrijver. Geometric Algorithms and Combinatorial Optimization, volume 2 of Algorithms and Combinatorics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2nd edition, 1988. 2nd edition 1994.
 
11
12
 
13
P. Kumar, J. S. B. Mitchell, and E. A. Yildirim. Fast smallest enclosing hypersphere computation. In Proc. 5th Workshop Algorithm Eng. Exper., 2003.
 
14
 
15
 
16
Y. Nesterov. Global quadratic optimization via conic relaxation. Technical report, Catholic University of Louvaine, Belgium, 1998.
 
17
A. Nemirovski, C. Roos, and T. Terlaky. On maximization of quadratic forms over intersection of ellipsoids with common center. Mathematical Programming, 86(3):463--473, 1999.
 
18


Collaborative Colleagues:
Sariel Har-Peled: colleagues
Kasturi Varadarajan: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: