ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Updating and constructing constrained delaunay and constrained regular triangulations by flips
Full text PdfPdf (326 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Models and meshes table of contents
Pages: 181 - 190  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-663-3
Author
Jonathan Richard Shewchuk  University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California
Sponsors
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/777792.777821
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

I discuss algorithms based on bistellar flips for inserting and deleting constraining (d - 1)-facets in d-dimensional constrained Delaunay triangulations (CDTs) and weighted CDTs, also known as constrained regular triangulations. The facet insertion algorithm is likely to outperform other known algorithms on most inputs. The facet deletion algorithm is the first proposed for d > 2, short of recomputing the CDT from scratch. An incremental facet insertion algorithm that begins with an unconstrained Delaunay triangulation can construct the CDT of a ridge-protected piecewise linear complex with nv vertices in O(nv[d / 2] + 1 log nv) time. Hence, in odd dimensions, CDT construction by incremental facet insertion is within a factor of log nv of worst-case optimal. Perhaps the most important feature of these algorithms is that they are relatively easy to implement.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Oswin Aichholzer, Franz Aurenhammer, and Hannes Krasser. Pseudo-Triangulations from Surfaces and a Novel Type of Edge Flip. Manuscript, 2003.
2
 
3
L.Paul Chew. Constrained Delaunay Triangulations. Algorithmica 4(1):97--108, 1989.
 
4
______.Guaranteed-Quality Triangular Meshes. Technical Report TR-89-983, Department of Computer Science, Cornell University, 1989.
 
5
 
6
Jesús A. de Loera, Francisco Santos, and Jorge Urrutia. The Number of Geometric Bistellar Neighbors of a Triangulation. Discrete & Computational Geometry 21(1):131--142, 1999.
 
7
Boris N. Delaunay. Sur la Sphère Vide. Izvestia Akademia Nauk SSSR, VII Seria, Otdelenie Matematicheskii i Estestvennyka Nauk 7:793--800, 1934.
8
 
9
 
10
Herbert Edelsbrunner and N. R. Shah. Incremental Topological Flipping Works for Regular Triangulations. Algorithmica 15(3):223--241, March 1996.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
Charles L. Lawson. Software for C1 Surface Interpolation. Mathematical Software III (John~R. Rice, editor), pages 161--194. Academic Press, New York, 1977.
 
15
 
16
Der-Tsai Lee and A. K. Lin. Generalized Delaunay Triangulations for Planar Graphs. Discrete & Computational Geometry 1:201--217, 1986.
 
17
Gary L. Miller, Dafna Talmor, Shang-Hua Teng, Noel Walkington, and Han Wang. Control Volume Meshes using Sphere Packing: Generation, Refinement and Coarsening. Fifth International Meshing Roundtable (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania), pages 47--61, October 1996.
 
18
Johann Radon. Mengen Konvexer Korper, die Einen Gemeinschaftlichen Punkt Enthalten. Mathematische Annalen 83:113--115, 1921.
 
19
 
20
______.Constrained Delaunay Triangulations and Voronoi Diagrams with Obstacles. 1978--1988 Ten Years IIG (H. S. Poingratz and W. Schinnerl, editors), pages 178--191. Institute for Information Processing, Graz University of Technology, 1988.
21
22
23
 
24
______.Constrained Delaunay Tetrahedralizations and Provably Good Boundary Recovery. Eleventh International Meshing Roundtable (Ithaca, New York), pages 193--204. Sandia National Laboratories, September 2002.
 
25
______.What is a Good Linear Element? Interpolation, Conditioning, and Quality Measures. Eleventh International Meshing Roundtable (Ithaca, New York), pages 115--126. Sandia National Laboratories, September 2002.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Jonathan Richard Shewchuk: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: