ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Incentive-compatible, budget-balanced, yet highly efficient auctions for supply chain formation
Full text pdf formatPdf (233 KB)
Source Electronic Commerce archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
Pages: 64 - 75  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-679-X
Authors
Moshe Babaioff  The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel
William E. Walsh  IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, Hawthorne, NY
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGEcom: ACM Special Interest Group on Electronic Commerce
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/779928.779937
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Engineering automated negotiation across the supply chain is a central research challenge for the important problem of supply chain formation. The difficult problem of designing negotiation strategies is greatly simplified if the negotiation mechanism is incentive compatible, in which case the agents' dominant strategy is to simply report their private information truthfully. Unfortunately, with two-sided negotiation it is impossible to simultaneously achieve perfect efficiency, budget balance, and individual rationality with incentive compatibility. This bears directly on the mechanism design problem for supply chain formation---the problem of designing auctions to coordinate the buying and selling of goods in multiple markets across a supply chain. We introduce incentive compatible, budget balanced, and individually rational auctions for supply chain formation inspired by previous work of Babaioff and Nisan, but extended to a broader class of supply chain topologies. The auctions explicitly discard profitable trades, thus giving up perfect efficiency to maintain budget balance and individual rationality. We use a novel payment rule analogous to Vickrey-Clarke-Groves payments, but adapted to our allocation rule. The first auction we present is incentive compatible when each agent desires only a single bundle of goods, the auction correctly knows all agents' bundles of interest, but the monetary valuations are private to the agents. We introduce extensions to maintain incentive compatibility when the auction does not know the agents' bundles of interest. We establish a good worst case bound on efficiency when the bundles of interest are known, which also applies in some cases when the bundles are not known. Our auctions produce higher efficiency for a broader class of supply chains than any other incentive compatible, individually rational , and budget-balanced auction we are aware of.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
E. H. Clarke. Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice, 11:17--33, Fall 1971.
 
3
 
4
T. Groves. Incentives in teams. Econometrica, pages 617--631, 1973.
5
 
6
J. K. MacKie-Mason and H. R. Varian. Generalized Vickrey auctions. Technical report, Dept. of Economics, Univ. of Michigan, July 1994.
 
7
R. P. McAfee. A dominant strategy double auction. Journal of Economic Theory, 56:434--450, 1992.
 
8
R. B. Myerson and M. A. Satterthwaite. Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Journal of Economic Theory, 29:265--281, 1983.
 
9
N. Nisan and A. Ronen. Algorithmic mechanism design. Games and Economic Behavior, 35(1/2):166--196, April/May 2001.
 
10
D. C. Parkes, J. Kalagnanam, and M. Eso. Achieving budget-balance with Vickrey-based payment schemes in exchanges. In Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1161--1168, 2001.
 
11
N. M. Sadeh, D. W. Hildum, D. Kjenstad, and A. Tseng. MASCOT: An agent-based architecture for dynamic supply chain creation and coordination in the internet economy. Production Planning and Control, 12(3), 2001.
 
12
W. Vickrey. Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16:8--37, 1961.
 
13
14


Collaborative Colleagues:
Moshe Babaioff: colleagues
William E. Walsh: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: