Article

Free access

TIM: a tool insertion method

Author:

Tilmann BruckhausAuthors Info & Claims

CASCON '94: Proceedings of the 1994 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research

Page 7

Published: 31 October 1994 Publication History

Abstract

Software tools play an important role in the software development process. Some tools are used by users taking on one specific role, in very specific activities and to process documents of a specific type (e.g., a compiler). Other tools are used by users in multiple roles, during many activities and for processing documents of multiple types (e.g., a configuration management system). Inserting a tool of the latter type into a process may have a significant impact on the development process. In order to control the insertion of such tools it is desirable to use a tool insertion method. Today, no such method exists. We propose such a method called "Tool Insertion Method (TIM)". The key elements of TIM are a method for customizing the tool to fit the organization's development process and a comprehensive measurements program that is used to quantify the goal of inserting a tool, tracking the progress of tool insertion and analyzing cost and benefit of the tool insertion. We also briefly describe how TIM was used to improve the process in an industrial software project. The projects's requirements planning process was re-engineered, and a commercially available tool was customized to support the improved process. This process spans multiple activities, operates on artifacts of several types and is carried out by multiple developers taking on different roles. The paper offers a formal model of TIM along with sample data gathered and experience gained during its application.

References

[1]

{1} V. Basili, G. Caldiera, F. McGarry, R Pajerski, G. Page, and S. Waligora. The software engineering laboratory - an operational software experience factory.]]

Digital Library

[2]

{2} V. R. Basili and H. D. Rombach. Tailoring the software process to project goals and environments. In Proc. 9th Int. Conf. on Soft. Eng., pages 345-357, Monterey, California, April 1987. IEEE Computer Society Press.]]

Digital Library

[3]

{3} M. Beer, R. Eisenstat, and B. Spector. Why change programs don't produce change. Harvard Business Review, pages 158-166, November-December 1990.]]

[4]

{4} David Bellin. Information Commodities and the Production Process: How the Introduction of CASE Tools Affects the Software Development Life Cycle. Ph.D. thesis, Ph.D. Dissertation, The City University of New York.]]

Digital Library

[5]

{5} Tilmann Bruckhaus. The impact of inserting a tool into a software process. In Ann Gawman, W. Morven Gentleman, Evelyn Kidd, Per-Ake Larson, and Jacob Slonim, editors, Proceedings of the 1993 CAS Conference, pages 250-264, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 1993. IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory.]]

Digital Library

[6]

{6} Takeshi Chusho. What makes software tools successful? IEEE Software, 10(5):63-65, September 1993.]]

Digital Library

[7]

{7} R. Dion. Process improvement and the corporate balance sheet. IEEE Software, pages 28-35, July 1993.]]

Digital Library

[8]

{8} P. Fowler and S. Rifkin. Software engineering process group guide. Technical Report, CMU/ SEI-90-TR-24, September 1990.]]

[9]

{9} J. Hauser and D. Clausing. The house of quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3):63-73, May-June 1988.]]

[10]

{10} C. Hollocker. Finding the cost of software quality. IEEE Trans. on Engineering Management, EM-33(4):223-228, November 86.]]

[11]

{11} WonKook Hong. A Method for Building Descriptive Software Process Models. Ph. D. Proposal, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, February 1993.]]

[12]

{12} Katherine Hornbach. The role of support staff in successful introduction of new tool technology. In TransFerring Software Engineering Tool Technology, pages 74-77, Piscataway, NJ, November 1987. Available from IEEE Service Cent (cat n 88TH0218-8).]]

[13]

{13} C. C. Huff. Elements of a realistic case tool adoption budget. Comm. ACM, 35(4):45-54, April 1992.]]

Digital Library

[14]

{14} W. S. Humphrey, T. Snyder, and R. Willis. Software process improvement at Hughes Aircraft. IEEE Software, pages 11-23, July 1991.]]

Digital Library

[15]

{15} W. S. Humphrey, D.H. Kitson, and T.C. Kasse. The state of software engineering practice: A preliminary report. In Proc. 11th Int. Conf. on Soft. Eng., pages 277-288, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, May 1989. IEEE Computer Society Press.]]

Digital Library

[16]

{16} N. H. Madhavji. The process cycle. IEE/BCS Software Engineering Journal, 6(5):234-242, September 1991.]]

Digital Library

[17]

{17} N. H. Madhavji, D. Höltje, W.-K. Hong, and T. Bruckhaus. Elicit: An Empirically Improved Method for Eliciting Process Models. Technical Report SE-94.4, School of Computer Science, McGill University, Montreal, March 1994. (Also published as Technical Report TR-74.141, IBM Canada Ltd. Laboratory, North York, Ontario, Canada, May 1994).]]

[18]

{18} M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis, and C. Weber. Capability maturity model, version 1.1. IEEE Software, pages 18-27, July 1993.]]

Digital Library

[19]

{19} R. Schaffer and H. Thompson. Successful change programs begin with results. Harvard Business Review, pages 80-89, January-February 1992.]]

[20]

{20} Conference on Transferring Software Engineering Tool Technology, Piscataway, NJ, November 1987. Available from IEEE Service Cent (cat n 88TH0218-8).]]

Cited By

Callahan JRamakrishnan S(1996)Software project management and measurement on the World-Wide-Web (WWW)Proceedings of the 5th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE'96)10.5555/832310.837296Online publication date: 19-Jun-1996
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/832310.837296
Bruckhaus TBockus D(1995)Analyzing CASE impactProceedings of the 1995 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research10.5555/781915.781925Online publication date: 7-Nov-1995
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/781915.781925

Index Terms

TIM: a tool insertion method
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Project and people management
        Systems development
      2. Software management
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software
      1. Software implementation planning
        Software design techniques
    2. Software development process management

Recommendations

Analyzing CASE impact
CASCON '95: Proceedings of the 1995 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research

In large-scale software development, tools are frequently adopted at high cost, to increase quality and productivity. A method for quantitative analysis of the impact of such tool insertions would allow an organization to plan and assess tool ...
Language-Based Process Model Discovery and Enhancement
SEAA '14: Proceedings of the 2014 40th EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications

Introducing process models into an organization entail many advantages even more when being adapted to the organizations specific environment and needs. Unnecessary processes may be omitted and never be planed or defined for execution, while the ...
A Methodical Approach to Establishing a Process Management Infrastructure in an Organization
STEP '97: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP '97) (including CASE '97)

This paper describes a practical, methodical and substantiative approach to setting up the essentials of a process management infrastructure in an organization. The paper discusses the key elements of a process management infrastructure, as being ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings

CASCON '94: Proceedings of the 1994 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research

October 1994

781 pages

Sponsors

Industry Canada
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council
IBM Canada: IBM Canada
NRC: National Research Council - Canada

Publisher

IBM Press

Publication History

Published: 31 October 1994

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 24 of 90 submissions, 27%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
280
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)43
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)12

Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Callahan JRamakrishnan S(1996)Software project management and measurement on the World-Wide-Web (WWW)Proceedings of the 5th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE'96)10.5555/832310.837296Online publication date: 19-Jun-1996
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/832310.837296
Bruckhaus TBockus D(1995)Analyzing CASE impactProceedings of the 1995 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research10.5555/781915.781925Online publication date: 7-Nov-1995
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/781915.781925

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten