skip to main content
article
Free Access

Some operational tools in a OSI protocols study environment

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 June 1984Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper deals with a strategy for a development chain of protocols (specification, validation, conformity testing) based on knowledge of the RHIN project methodology and the tools which this project produced. This methodology is based on finite state machines with predicates and includes “conceptual” tools for specification (PDIL)and for validation (VADILOC). “Experimental” tools play a part in conformity testing (STQ, Cerbere, Genepi). The interaction between conceptual and experimental tools is provided by a test sequence generator GAST which, starting from an automaton whose communication has been validated, provides sequences to be used by the test tools.

References

  1. 1 J.P. ANSART, O. RAFIQ, V. CHARI PDIL: Protocol Description and Implementation Language. IFIP 82 (*). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 J.P. ANSART Génépi: A Protocol Independent System For Testing Protocol Implementation. IFIP 82 (*). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 J.P. ANSART LISE: Logiciel Interactif de Simulation, validation et Evaluation de protocole. Rapport technique RHIN FDT 7539. Sept 83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 J.P. ANSART, V. CHARI, M. MEYER, O. RAFIQ, D. SIMON Description, simulation, implementation of communication protocols using PDIL. ACM Sigcomm' 83 Symposium on communication architectures and protocols, Un. of Texas et Austin, March 83. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5 J.M. AYACHE, J.P. COURTIAT, M. DIAZ A specification language for the design of multilayer protocols. 15th Annual Hawaï.Int Conf. on System Sciences, Honolulu, June 82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 M. BILLAUD, A. VITAL Système de manipulation d'automates d'états finis avec predicats et applications. Rapport de DEA, Un. de Bordeaux I, Jun.82Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 G.V. BOCHMANN, J. GECSEI A unified method for the specification of communication protocols. Proc. IFIP congress Toronto, p. 229-234, Aug. 77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 G.V. BOCHMANN Finite state description of communication protocols. Computer Networks, Vol. 2, p. 361-372, Oct. 78.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 B. BONHOMME STQ. Système de test et qualification. Journées RHIN () p. 207-225.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 A. CHAMPEVILLE, K. DAHER Système de génération automatique de séquences de test. Rapport de DEA, Un. de Bordeaux, Jun. 83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11 B. CHEZALVIEL-PRADIN Un outil graphique interactif pour la validation des systèmes à évolution parallèle décrits par les réseaux de Petri (OGIVE). Thèse de Docteur Ingénieur. UPS Toulouse, Déc. 79.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 J. DAMIDAU, J.P. ANSART Cerbère. A tool to keep an Eye on high level protocols. IFIP 82 (*). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13 P. GUITTON Réalisation d'un système de test de conformité d'implantation à Un protocole de communication. Rapport de DEA, Un. de Bordeaux I, Juin 82.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 P. GUITTON Description, validation et test de conformité de protocoles. Thèse de 3è Cycle Un. de Bordeaux I, Janv. 84.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 M. LUREAU, E. MARIANI PDIL: Implantation automatique de protocoles à partir d'une description formelle. Journées RHIN () pp. 125-139.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 P.M. MERLIN A methodology for the design and implementation of communication protocols. IEEE trans. on communication, vol. COM 24-5, Jun 1976, pp. 614-621.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 O. RAFIQ, J.P. ANSART Vadiloc. A protocol validator and its applications. IFIP, WG 6-1, 3 rd international workshop on protocol specification, testing and verification. Zurich; Jun. 83.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 O. RAFIQ Etude sur les techniques de description des protocoles de communications et applications. Thèse d'Etat, Un. de Bordeaux I, Juin 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 D. RAYNER A system for testing protocol implementations. IFIP 82 (*). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20 B. SARIKAYA, G.V. BOCHMANN Some experience with test sequence generation for protocols.# IFIP 82 (*). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. 21 G.D. SCHUTZ, D.B. ROSE, C.H. WEST, J.P. GRAY Executable Description and Validation of SNA. IEEE trans. on Communications COM-28,4, April 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 N.V. STENNING A data transfer protocol. Computer networks, vol. 1-2, Sept. 76, p. 99-110.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 P. ZAFIROPOULO, C.H. WEST, H. RUDIN, D.D. COWAN, D. BRAND Towards analysing and synthesizing protocols.# IEEE trans. on communication, vol. COM 28-4, April 80, p. 651-661.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Some operational tools in a OSI protocols study environment

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 14, Issue 2
          June 1984
          245 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/639624
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1984 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 June 1984

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader