skip to main content
10.1145/800067.802115acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuccsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The Group Rep: Effective decentralization of applications support

Published:10 November 1982Publication History

ABSTRACT

At the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA), we have succeeded in providing computation application support to all parts of this decentralized research organization by decentralizing our staff.

CNA is divided into four functionally separate departments, each overseen by a Vice President and broken functionally into smaller programs or divisions. Three departments do studies of day-to-day Navy operations, long-term Navy planning, and the Marine Corps; the fourth is concerned with CNA's administration.

Applications Support operates in an environment much like that of any university user services group serving users with a wide variety of needs, skills, and applications. The application consultants are call Group Representatives.

The Group Reps, serving as the first line of consulting support, share office space with the study teams they support. They speed communications throughout CNA and are in a position to gain detailed knowledge about applications peculiar to their projects. They also tend to build close working relationships with their “customers.”

Finally, Group Reps are often major participants in research for CNA's clients in the Department of the Navy and elsewhere. Research results are reported at the highest levels of government and often affect important decisions. There are four useful results of such participation in research. First, the Group Rep gains greater respect from the line organization. Second, being a “user” endows the Group Rep with a little more understanding and even a touch of humility. Third, the Group Rep develops experience with new tools. Finally, the Group Rep who wants a career path into the line organization is thus provided with one.

The remainder of this paper covers issues that may prove useful to anyone who is considering the advantages of setting up a similarly oriented user services organization. The appendix tries to define the Group Rep position in more detail.

References

  1. 1.Herzberg, Frederick "One More Time: How Do You Motivate Employees?" How Successful Executives Handle People, Harvard Business Review, vol.46 no. 1, Jan-Feb 68, pp53-62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2."Study finds 60% of users happy with DP depts&rdquo.;, Computerworld, 19 April 82, p4.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3."Happy Shop? Find What Motivates People", Management Information System Week, 9 June 1982, p58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4."Exec identifies seven reasons why DPers quit", Computerworld, 19 April 82, p25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Group Rep: Effective decentralization of applications support

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGUCCS '82: Proceedings of the 10th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services
        November 1982
        273 pages
        ISBN:0897910885
        DOI:10.1145/800067

        Copyright © 1982 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 10 November 1982

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate123of170submissions,72%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)7
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader