skip to main content
article
Free Access

A versatile queueing model for data switching

Published:01 October 1981Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In a data network, when messages arrive at a switch to be served (transmitted) on a line, it seems reasonable to assume that the arrival process can be described as a Poisson (random) process. However, when messages are divided into a number of packets of a maximum length, these packets arrive bunched together. This gives rise to what is referred to as “peaked” traffic. The degree of peakedness depends on 1) the interarrival time of packets associated with a particular message and 2) the distribution of the number of packets per message. In this paper we describe a queueing model which accounts for the non-Poissonian nature of the packet arrival process as a function of these two factors. Since packets are of a fixed maximum length, the model assumes that the packet service time is constant, as opposed to the mathematically more tractable but less realistic assumption of exponentially-distributed service time.

This queueing model is then used to describe the network delay as affected by:

1. Message switching versus packet switching,

2. A priority discipline in the queues,

3. Packet interarrival time per message, which is probably controlled by the line speed at the packet origination point, and

4. A network which carries only short inquiry-response traffic as opposed to a network which also carries longer low-priority printer traffic.

The general conclusions are that the peakedness in the arrival process caused by a short interarrival time of packets per message and the longer printer traffic would cause excessive delays in a network. If inquiry-response traffic with a short response-time requirement is also to be carried on the same network a priority discipline has considerable value. Message switching for such a combination of traffic should be avoided.

References

  1. 1 Amoss, J. J. "Planning for the Bell Operating Systems Network," Proceedings of the Fifth ICCC, Atlanta, Ga. 27-30 October 1980, pp 559-563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 Heffes, H., "A Class of Data Traffic Processes - Covariance Function Characterization and Related Queueing Results," B.S.T.J., V. 59, No.6 July-Aug. 1980, pp 897-929.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Lucantoni, D. M., and Neuts, M. F., "Numerical Methods for a Class of Markov Chains Arising in Queueing Theory", Tech. Rep. No. 78/10, Dept. of Statistics and Computer Science, University of Delaware, May 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Miyahara, H., Hasegawa, T., and Teshigawara, Y., "A comparative evaluation of switching methods in computer communication networks", Proceedings of the International Conference on Communications (San Francisco, Calif. 1975), pp. 616-620.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Neuts, M. F., "A Versatile Markovian Point Process", J. Appl. Prob., Vol. 16, 1979, pp. 764-779.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. 6 Neuts, M. F., Personal notes.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Schwartz, M., "Computer-Communications Network Design and Analysis", Prentice-Hall, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8 Yechiali, U., and Naor, P., "Queueing Problems with Heterogeneous Arrivals and Service", Operations Research, Vol. 19, 1971, pp. 722-734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A versatile queueing model for data switching

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 11, Issue 4
          October 1981
          249 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/1013879
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1981 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 October 1981

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader