skip to main content
10.1145/800127.804131acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-national-conferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Software Blueprints

Published:04 December 1978Publication History

ABSTRACT

The process of developing a software product is analogous to the process by which a building concept becomes a reality. Reliability is insured in both processes by validation of the design with a blueprint prior to construction. Just as the architect relies on blueprints to validate his plans for construction of a building, so may the software developer rely on software blueprints to validate his plans for construction of a software product. The sequence of steps in software development include determination of requirements, specification of the various modules or subprograms to be developed, preparation of the module blueprints, peer review of the blueprints, construction or coding of the modules, module testing, and system testing. The module blueprint is the focal point of the process. Utilizing the structured flowcharting techniques of Nassi and Shneiderman, the blueprint is prepared as a working design document. It contains the complete coding requirements of the module and includes a graphical representation of the detailed logic performed, an English description of the action performed, and the actual source code of the programming language employed.

Currently recognized benefits of peer review are refined and expanded when the procedure is applied to validation of software blueprints. The degree of understanding, and thus error detection, is superior to that obtained from applying the review technique to source code listings. The blueprint review introduces an apprenticeship environment in which learning is quickened and the time required for a novice to obtain the capability of mature design is lessened.

The procedures used provide a prototype for future software design applications.

References

  1. 1.Alexander, Christopher, Notes on Synthesis of Form (Harvard University Press, 1964).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Baker, F.T., Mills, H.D., Chief Programmer Teams, Datamation (December, 1973).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.Baucom, P.H., Productivity and Measurement: A Structured Programming Spin-Off, Fifth Annual Conference on Principles of Software Development, pp.69-101 (Control Data Corporation, 1977).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Chapin, N., New Format for Flowcharts, Software - Practice and Experience, Vol. 4, pp.341-357 (1974).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.Fagan, M.E., Inspecting Software Design and Code, Datamation (December 1973).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Miller, E.F., Lindamood, G.E., Structured Programming: Top-down Approach, Datamation (December 1973).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Myers, G.J., Reliable Software Through Composite Design (Petrocelli/Charter, 1975). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Nassi, I., Shneiderman, B., Flowchart Techniques for Structured Programming, Sigplan Notices, Vol. 8, No. 8 (August, 1973). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9.Schower, A.M., Introduction of Software Engineering Techniques to Mature Software Systems, Fourth Annual Conference on Principles of Software Development, pp.69-101 (Control Data Corporation, 1977)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Structured Walk-Throughs: A Project Management Tool (IBM Corporation, August, 1973).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Software Blueprints

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader