skip to main content
10.1145/800171.809602acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesacm-national-conferenceConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Knowledge representation and inference control of SPERIL-II

Published:01 January 1984Publication History

ABSTRACT

SPERIL-II is an expert system for damage assessment of existing structures. Fuzzy sets for imprecise data and Dempster and Shafer's theory for combining fuzzy sets with certainty factors are used in an inexact inference. Since the process of the damage assessment is quite complex, metarules are used to control the inference in order to improve the effectiveness and reliability of results. The metarules in SPERIL-II are represented in logic form with emphases on the explicit representation of the selection of the rule group and the suitable inference method.

References

  1. 1.Bresler, B. and J.M. Hanson (1982). Damageability and Reliability of Existing Structures, Ninth U.S. National Congress of Applied Mechanics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 309-313.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Buchanan, B.G. and E.A. Geigenbaum (1978). DENDRAL and METADENDRAL: Their Application Dimension, Artificial Intelligence, 11, 5-24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Clancey, W.J. and R. Letsinger (1981). NEOMYCIN: Reconfiguring A Rule-Based Expert System for Application to Teaching, IJCAI-81, 829-836.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.Clocksin, W., and C. Mellish, (1981). Programming in Prolog, Springer Verlag, New York. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Davis, R. (1980). Meta-Rules: Reasoning about Control, Artificial Intelligence, 15, 197-222.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.Davis, R. et al. (1982). Diagnosis Based on Description of Structure and Function, Proc. Second Nati. Conf. of AI, 137-142.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.Davis, R. and D. B. Lenat (1982). Knowledge-Based Systems in Artificial Intelligence, McGraw-Hill. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8.Dempster, A.P. (1967). Upper and Lower Probabilities Induced by a Multi-valued Mapping, Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 38, 325-339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. 9.Erman, L.D. and Lessor, U.R. (1975). A multi-level organization for problem solving using many, diverse, cooperating sources of knowledge. IJCAI-75, 483-490.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.Garvey, T.D., J. D. Lowrance and M. A. Fischler (1981). An inference technique for integrating knowledge from disparate sources, Proceeding of 7th IJCAI, 319-325.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Georgeff, M., and U. Bonollo (1983). Procedural Expert System. IJCAI-83, 151-157.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.Greiner, R. and D. B. Lenat (1980). A Representation Language, The First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 165-168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Irown, C. B. (1979). A fuzzy safety measure. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 105, EM5, 855-872.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Ishizuka, M., K. S. Fu and J. T. P. Yao (1980). Inference Method for Damage Assessment System of Existing Structures, Structural Eng. Report, CE-STR-80-17, Civil Eng., Purdue University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.Ishizuka, M., K. S. Fu and J. T. P. Yao (1981a). Inexact Inference for Rule-Based Damage Assessment of Existing Structures, Proc. of 7th IJCAI, 837-842.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Ishizuka, M., K. S. Fu and J. T. P. Yao (1981b). SPERIL-I: Computer Based Structural Damage Assessment System, Structural Eng. Report, CE-STR-81-36. Civil Eng., Purdue Univ., Oct.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.Ishizuka, M., K. S. Fu and J. T. P. Yao (1982). A Rule-Based Inference with Fuzzy Set for Structural Damage Assessment, Submitted to Cupta, M. M. and Sanchez, E. ed., Fuzzy Information and Decision Processes, North Holland Pub. Co.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.Kim, J. H. and J. Pearl (1983). A computational model for causal and diagnostic reasoning in inference system, Proceeding of 8th IJCAI, 190-193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.Lenat, D. et al. (1983). Reasoning about Reasoning, in Building Expert Systems. (eds. F. Hayes-Roth, D. A. Waterman, and D. B. Lenat), 219-239.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.Minsky, M. (1975). A Framework for Representing Knowledge, in P. H. Winston (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision, McGraw-Hill.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.Ogawa, H., K. S. Fu, and J. T. P. Yao (1983). An Expert System for Structure Damage Assessment, Structural Eng. Report, CE-STR-83-33, Civil Eng., Purdue University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.Shafer, G. (1976). A Mathematical Theory of Evidence, Princeton Univ. Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.Shapiro, E. Y. (1983). Logic Programs with Uncertainties: A Tool for Implementing Rule-Based Systems, IJCAI-83, 529-532.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.Shortliffe, E.H. et al. (1981). ONCOCIN: An Expert System for Oncology Protocol Management, IJCAI-81, 876-881.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.Stefik, M. (1981). Planning and Meta-Planning (MOLGEN: Part 2), Artificial Intelligence, 16, 141-170.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. 26.Thoft-Christensen, P. and M. J. Baker (1982). Structural Reliability Theory and Its Applications, Springer-Verlag, New Yark.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.Wesley, L. P. (1983). Reading about control: the investigation of an evidential approach, Proceeding of 8th IJCAI, 203-206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.Yager, R. R. (1982). Generalized Probabilities of Fuzzy Events from Fuzzy Belief Structures, INFORMATION SCIENCES, 28, 45-62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. 29.Yao, J. T. P. (1982). Damage evaluation for structural reliability assessment, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 75, 205-212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. 30.Zadeh, L. A. (1968). Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility, Int. J. Fuzzy Sets System, 1, 1, 3-28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. 31.WJE, Technical Reports, Wiss, Janney Elstner and Associates, Inc., 330 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL, 60062.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Knowledge representation and inference control of SPERIL-II

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ACM '84: Proceedings of the 1984 annual conference of the ACM on The fifth generation challenge
          January 1984
          336 pages
          ISBN:089791144X
          DOI:10.1145/800171

          Copyright © 1984 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 January 1984

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader