Abstract
Is one picture really worth a thousand words? Why do cleverly designed graphic displays make visual information stand out more clearly with strikingly greater impact than numbers buried in pages of computer printout?
Graphic output devices shift the burden of integrating information generated by computers onto the human vision system: the sensory channel with the highest capacity for distributed parallel processing. The system consists of hundreds of successive two-dimensional arrays of millions of interconnected parallel computers. Perception seems instantaneous because we are not conscious of the massive amounts of computation that occur. What we consciously “see at a glance” is already a highly structured, synthesized, and summarized version of the actual light intensity mosaic that enters the retina.
We will demonstrate some results of the visual structuring that occurs in the human visual system, show why some features stand out instantaneously and others do not, and explain why knowledge of the human input device is crucial to the design of effective computer output devices and displays.
- 1 Abramov, I. Further analysis of the responses of LGN cells. J.Opt.Soc.Am. 58, 574-579 (1968).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 2 Bajcsy, R. A computational structure for color perception. Moore School of EE Tech. Report, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (1975).Google Scholar
- 3 Barlow, H.B., Blakemore, C. & Pettigrew, J.D. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J.Physiol. 193, 327-342 (1967).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 4 Barlow, H.B., Hill, R.M. & Levick, W.R. Retinal ganglion cells responding selectively to direction and speed of image motion in the rabbit. J.Physiol. 173, 377-407 (1964).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 5 Berry, R.N. Quantitative relations among vernier, real depth, and stereoscopic depth acuities. J.Exp.Psychol. 38, 708-721 (1948).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 6 Blakemore, C. & Campbell, F.W. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J.Physiol. 203, 237-260 (1969).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7 Boynton, R.M. & Kaiser, P.K. Vision: the additivity law made to work for heterochromatic photometry with bipartite fields. Science 161, 366-368 (1968).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8 Cornsweet, T.N. Visual Perception. New York: Academic Press, 1970.Google Scholar
- 9 Crow, F.C. The aliasing problem in computer-synthesized shaded images. CACM 20, 799-805 (1977). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10 DeValois, R.L. Analysis and coding of color vision in the primate visual system. Cold Spring Harbor Symp.Quant.Biol. 30, 567-579 (1965).Google Scholar
- 11 DeValois, R.L., Abramov, I. & Jacobs, G.H. Analysis of response patterns of LGN cells. J.Opt.Soc.Am. 56, 966-977 (1966).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 12 DeValois, R.L. & Pease, P.L. Contours and contrast: responses of monkey lateral geniculate cells to luminance and color figures. Science 171, 694-696 (1971).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13 Gregory, R.L. Eye and Brain. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1966.Google Scholar
- 14 Joblove, G.H. & Greenberg, D. Color spaces for computer graphics. Proc. SIGGRAPH-78, Atlanta GA, 20-25 (August 1978). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 15 Hamerley, J.R. & Springer, R.M. Perception of raggedness of edge images. Op.Soc.Am.Meeting, San Francisco CA (November 1978).Google Scholar
- 16 Harmon, L.D. & Julesz, B. Masking in visual recognition: effects of two-dimensional filtered noise. Science 180, 1194-1196 (1973).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17 Hubel, D.H. & Wiesel, T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction, and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J.Physiol. 160, 106-154 (1962).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18 Hurvich, L.M. & Jameson, D. An opponent-process theory of color vision. Psyc.Rev. 64, 384-404 (1957).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 19 Julesz, B. Foundations of Cyclopean Vision. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press, 1971.Google Scholar
- 20 Julesz, B. Experiments in the visual perception of texture. Sci.Am. 232, 34-43 (1975).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 21 Julesz, B., Gilbert, E.N., Shepp, L.A. & Frisch, H.L. Inability of humans to discriminate between visual textures that agree in second-order statistics: revisited. Perception 2, 391-405 (1973).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 22 Mansfield, J.R.W. Neural basis of orientation perception in primate vision. Science 186, 1133-1135 (1974).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 23 McCollough, C. Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science 149, 1115-1116 (1965).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 24 Montalvo, F.S. Aftereffects, adaptation, and plasticity: a neural model for tunable feature space. PhD thesis, Comp. & Info. Sci. Dept. Tech. Report 76-4, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (September 1976). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 25 Over, R. Comparison of normalization theory and neural enhancement explanation of negative aftereffects. Psyc.Bulletin 75, 225-243 (1971).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 26 Ratliff, F. Mach Bands. San Francisco: Holden-Day, 1965.Google Scholar
- 27 Ratliff, F. & Hartline, H.K. The responses of Limulus optic nerve fibers to patterns of illumination on the retinal mosaic. J.Gen.Physiol. 42, 1241-1255 (1959).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 28 Riggs, L.A. Visual acuity. In C.H. Graham (Ed.) Vision and Visual Perception. New York: Wiley & Sons, 321-349 (1965).Google Scholar
- 29 Smith, A.R. Color gamut transform pairs. Proc. SIGGRAPH-78, Atlanta GA, 12-19 (August 1978). Google ScholarDigital Library
- 30 Van Der Horst, G.J.C. Fourier analysis and color discrimination. J.Opt.Soc.Am. 59, 1670-1676 (1969).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 31 Weisstein, N. Metacontrast. In L.M. Hurvich & D. Jameson (Eds.) Visual Psychophysics. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 233-272 (1972).Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Human vision and computer graphics
Recommendations
Human vision and computer graphics
SIGGRAPH '79: Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniquesIs one picture really worth a thousand words? Why do cleverly designed graphic displays make visual information stand out more clearly with strikingly greater impact than numbers buried in pages of computer printout?
Graphic output devices shift the ...
Computer graphics pioneers
When Editor Gordon Cameron asked me if I thought a regular column in Computer Graphics authored by computer graphics "pioneers" would be a good idea, I responded with an enthusiastic "yes." Then he asked me if I wanted to write it, and I became somewhat ...
Interactive computer graphics for assisting human programmers
SIGGRAPH '74: Proceedings of the 1st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniquesA theory exists that a graphic "transfer function" of humans may be characterizable. A computer graphic terminal trained with an understanding of this function may be capable of identifying with a human and appreciably raising the potential quality of ...
Comments