ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
SETS: search enhanced by topic segmentation
Full text PdfPdf (308 KB)
Source Annual ACM Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval archive
Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval table of contents
Toronto, Canada
SESSION: Distributed information retrieval table of contents
Pages: 306 - 313  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-646-3
Authors
Mayank Bawa  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Gurmeet Singh Manku  Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Prabhakar Raghavan  Verity Inc.
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 86,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/860435.860491
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present SETS, an architecture for efficient search in peer-to-peer networks, building upon ideas drawn from machine learning and social network theory. The key idea is to arrange participating sites in a topic-segmented overlay topology in which most connections are short-distance, connecting pairs of sites with similar content. Topically focused sets of sites are then joined together into a single network by long-distance links. Queries are matched and routed to only the topically closest regions. We discuss a variety of design issues and tradeoffs that an implementor of SETS would face. We show that SETS is efficient in network traffic and query processing load.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
J. Callan. Distributed information retrieval. Advances in Information Retrieval, pages 127--150, 2000.
5
 
6
Citeseer: Scientific literature digital library (http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/cs).
 
7
E. Cohen, H. Kaplan, and A. Fiat. Associative search in peer-to-peer networks: Harnessing latent semantics. In Proc. IEEE Infocom, 2003.
 
8
J. G. Conrad, X. S. Guo, P. Jackson, and M. Meziou. Database selection using actual physical and acquired logical collection resources in a massive domain-specific operational environment. In Proc. 28th Conf. on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), pages 71--82, 2002.
 
9
10
 
11
S. Feld. Social structural determinants of similarity among associates. In American Sociological Review (47), 1982.
12
13
 
14
M. S. Granovetter. The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In Sociological Theory (1), 1983.
15
16
17
 
18
G. S. Manku, M. Bawa, and P. Raghavan. Symphony: Distributed hashing in a small world. In Proc. 4th USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems (USITS), pages 127--140, 2003.
 
19
S. Milgram. The small world problem. In Psychology Today 1(67), 1967.
 
20
S. Milliner, M. Papazoglou, and H. Weigand. Linguistic tool based information elicitation in large heterogeneous database networks. In Proc. Workshop on Natural Language and Databases (NLDB), 1996.
 
21
 
22
C. H. Ng and K. C. Sia. Peer clustering and firework query model. In Poster in 11th Conf. on World Wide Web (WWW), 2002.
 
23
J. J. Ordille and B. P. Miller. Distributed active catalogs and meta-data caching in descriptive name services. In Proc. Conf. on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pages 120--129, 1993.
 
24
25
26
 
27
28
29
30
 
31
C. Tang, Z. Xu, and M. Mahalingam. Peersearch: Efficient information retrieval in peer-to-peer networks. In HotNets-I, 2002.
 
32
33
34
35
36
37
 
38

CITED BY  19
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Mayank Bawa: colleagues
Gurmeet Singh Manku: colleagues
Prabhakar Raghavan: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: