skip to main content
10.1145/860435.860525acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesirConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

XML retrieval: what to retrieve?

Published:28 July 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

The fundamental difference between standard information retrieval and XML retrieval is the unit of retrieval. In traditional IR, the unit of retrieval is fixed: it is the complete document. In XML retrieval, every XML element in a document is a retrievable unit. This makes XML retrieval more difficult: besides being relevant, a retrieved unit should be neither too large nor too small. The research presented here, a comparative analysis of two approaches to XML retrieval, aims to shed light on which XML elements should be retrieved. The experimental evaluation uses data from the Initiative for the Evaluation of XML retrieval (INEX 2002).

References

  1. N. Fuhr, N. Gövert, G. Kazai, and M. Lalmas, editors. INEX 2002 Workshop Proceedings, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. N. Gövert, M. Abolhassani, N. Fuhr, and K. Grosjohann. Content oriented XML retrieval with HyREX. In Fuhr et al. {1}, pages 13--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. K. Hatano, H. Kinutani, and M. Watanabe. An appropriate unit of retrieval results for XML document retrieval. In Fuhr et al. {1}, pages 66--71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Hiemstra. Using Language Models for Information Retrieval. PhD thesis, University of Twente, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. J. Kekäläinen and K. Järvelin. Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. JASIST, 53:1120--1129, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. M. Marx, J. Kamps, and M. de Rijke. The University of Amsterdam at INEX-2002. In Fuhr et al. {1}, pages 24--28.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. S. H. Myaeng, D.-H. Jang, M.-S. Kim, and Z.-C. Zhoo. A flexible model for retrieval of SGML documents. In SIGIR 1998, pages 138--145, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Salton, J. Allan, and C. Buckley. Approaches to passage retrieval in full text information systems. In SIGIR 1993, pages 49--58, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. Wilkinson. Effective retrieval of structured documents. In SIGIR 1994, pages 311--317, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. XML retrieval: what to retrieve?

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            SIGIR '03: Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in informaion retrieval
            July 2003
            490 pages
            ISBN:1581136463
            DOI:10.1145/860435

            Copyright © 2003 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 28 July 2003

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            SIGIR '03 Paper Acceptance Rate46of266submissions,17%Overall Acceptance Rate792of3,983submissions,20%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader