Mapping the expanding landscape of usability: the case of distributed education

Abstract

As the environments in which we use technology become more complex and more diverse, we need to extend and expand our notion of usability to include a broad spectrum of users and user activities. We take as an example the case of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute's distributed education program for human-computer interaction (HCI). While HCI is the subject matter for the courses, the courses themselves present a challenging case study in HCI usability.

References

1. Adler, P., & Winograd, T. (1992). Usability: Turning technologies into tools. NY: Oxford UP.
2. Applen, J. D. (2002). Technical communication, knowledge management, and XML. Technical Communication 49.3.301--313.
3. Carliner, S. (2000). Physical, cognitive, affective: A three-part framework for information design. Technical Communication 47.4. 561--576.
4. Caroll, J. M., & Campbell, R. L. (1986). Softening up hard science: Reply to Newell and Card. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2. 251--267.
5. Carrol, J. M. (1990). The nurnberg funnel: Designing minimalist instruction for practical computer skill. Cambridge: MIT Press.
6. Carrol, J. M. (1998). Minimalism beyond the nurnberg funnel. Cambridge: MIT Press.
7. Grey, W. D. (2002). Simulated task environments: The role of high-fidelity simulations, scaled worlds, synthetic environments, and laboratory tasks in basic and applied cognitive research. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2002.2. 205--227.
8. Hackos, J. T. (2000). Trends for 2000: Moving beyond the cottage. Intercom 47 6--10.
9. Holtzblatt, K., & Beyer, H. (1997). Contextual design." A customer-centered approach to systems design. New York: Morgan Kaufmann.
10. Johnson, R. (1998). User-centered technology: A rhetorical theory for computers and other mundane artifacts. Albany: SUNY Press.
11. Lau, L. (2000). Distance learning technologies: Issues, trends and opportunities. Hershey PA: Idea Group Publishing.
12. Nardi, B. (1997). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press. 69--101.
13. Newell, A., & Card, S. K. (1985a). The prospects for psychological science in human-computer interaction. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 1.1. 209--242.
14. Newell, A., & Card, S. K. (1986). Straigtening out softening up: Response to Caroll and Campbell. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 2. 251--267.
15. Norman, D. (1990). The design of everyday things. NY: Doubleday.
16. Palen, L., & Salzman, M. (2002). Beyond the hand-set: Designing for wireless communications usability. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 9.2. 125--151.
17. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace. San Francisco CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
18. Porter, L. A. (1997). Creating the virtual classroom: Distance learning with the internet. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
19. Redish, J. C. (1995). Adding value as a professional technical communicator. Technical Communication 42.1. 26--39.
20. Schelin, E. (2001). Higher education: A new model for education. E-learning magazine (May) 2001. http://www.elearningmag.com/elearning/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=4042
21. Sullivan, P. (1989). Beyond a narrow conception of usability testing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 32. 256--264.
22. Sutcliffe, A. (2000). On the effective use and reuse of HCI knowledge. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7.2. 197--221.

Index Terms

• Applied computing

  • Education

    • Distance learning

    • E-learning