Exploration and virtual camera control in virtual three dimensional environments

ABSTRACT

This paper evaluates three distinct metaphors for exploration and virtual camera control in virtual environments using a six degree of freedom input device. The metaphors are "eyeball in hand", "scene in hand", and "flying vehicle control". These metaphors have been implemented and evaluated using an IRIS workstation and a Polhemus 3Space. The system has the capability to record the motion path followed during an exploration session and this can be recorded and played back to create a movie. Evaluation is through intensive structured interview sessions wherein subjects are required to complete a number of tasks involving three different "toy" environments. None of the metaphors is judged the best in all situations, rather the different metaphors each have advantages and disadvantages depending on the particular task. For example, "scene in hand" is judged to be good for manipulating closed objects, but is not good for moving through an interior; whereas "flying vehicle control" is judged the best for navigating through the interior, but is poor for moving around a closed object.

References

1. {1} Badler, N.I., Manoochehri, K.H., and Baraff, D., Multi-Dimensional Input Techniques and Articulated Figure Positioning by Multiple Constraints. Proc. 1986 Workshop in Interactive 3D Graphics, F. Crow and S.M. Pizar, eds, ACM, New York, pp. 151-169, 1986.
2. {2} Brenner, M., Intensive Interviewing, In The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches, M. Brenner, J. Brown and D. Canter, Eds. Academic Press: London, pp. 147-162, 1985.
3. {3} Brooks, F.P., Walkthrough -- A Dynamic Graphics System for Simulating Virtual Buildings. Proc. 1986 Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics, F. Crow and S.M. Pizar, eds, ACM, New York, pp. 9-21, 1986.
4. {4} Brooks, F.P., Grasping Reality Through Illusion: Interactive Graphics Serving Science. CHI'88 Proceedings , Special Issue of the SIGCHI Bulletin, pp. 1-11, 1988.
5. {5} Chen, M., Mountford, S.J., and Sellen, A., A study of Interactive 3D Rotation Using 2D Control Devices. Computer Graphics, 22(4), pp. 121- 129, 1988.
6. {6} Evans, K.B., Tanner, P.P., and Wein, M., Human Spatial Orientation. Tablet based valuators that provide one, two, or three degrees of freedom. Computer Graphics, 15(3), pp. 91-97, 1981.
7. {7} Fisher, S.S., McGreevy, M., Humphries, J., and Robinett, W., Virtual Environment Display System. Proc. 1986 Workshop on Interactive 3D Graphics, F. Crow and S.M. Pizar, eds, ACM, New York, pp. 77-88, 1986.
8. {8} Kelley, C.R., Manual and Automatic Control. Wiley, New York, 1968.
9. {9} Manktelow, K., and Jones, J., Principles from the Psychology of Thinking and Mental Models. In Applying Cognitive Psychology to User Interface Design , M.M. Gardiner and B. Christie, eds., Wiley, New York, 1987.
10. {10} Mostyn, B., The Content Analysis of Qualitative Research Data: A Dynamic Approach. In The Research Interview: Uses and Approaches J.M. Brenner, T. Brown and D. Canter, eds, Academic Press: London, pp. 115-145, 1985.
11. {11} Schmandt, C., Spatial input display correspondence in a stereoscopic computer graphic workstation. Computer Graphics, 17(3), pp. 253-259. 1983.
12. {12} Sutherland, I.E., Head Mounted Three Dimensional Display. Proc. of the Fall Joint Computer Conference, Vol. 33, pp. 757-764, 1968.
13. {13} Veldhuyzen, W., and Stassen, H.G., The internal model concept: An application to modelling human control of large ships. Human Factors, 19, pp. 367-380, 1977.
14. {14} Ware, C., Using Hand Position for Virtual Object Placement. (A report of empirical results using the Bat for placement). Submitted for publication.
15. {15} Ware, C. and Jessome, D.R., Using the Bat: A six-Dimensional mouse for Object Placement, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 8, 6, pp. 155- 160, 1988.
16. {16} Zimmerman, T.G., Lanier, J., Blanchard, C., and Harvill, Y., A Hand Gesture Interface Device, CHI+GI Proceedings, Toronto, pp. 189-192.

Index Terms

• Computing methodologies

  • Artificial intelligence

    • Computer vision

      • Image and video acquisition

        • Motion capture

  • Computer graphics

    • Animation

      • Motion capture

      • Motion processing

    • Graphics systems and interfaces

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)

    • Interaction devices

      • Graphics input devices