ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis on the redundancy of wireless sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (203 KB)
Source International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international conference on Wireless sensor networks and applications table of contents
San Diego, CA, USA
SESSION: Routing, coverage, and topology control table of contents
Pages: 108 - 114  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-764-8
Authors
Yong Gao  University of Alberta, AB, Canada
Kui Wu  University of Victoria, BC, Canada
Fulu Li  M.I.T., Cambridge, MA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 181,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/941350.941366
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Wireless sensor networks consist of a large number of tiny sensors that have only limited energy supply. One of the major challenges in constructing such networks is to maintain long network lifetime as well as sufficient sensing area. To achieve this goal, a broadly-used method is to turn off redundant sensors. In this paper, the problem of estimating redundant sensing areas among neighbouring wireless sensors is analysed. We present an interesting observation concerning the minimum and maximum number of neighbours that are required to provide complete redundancy and introduce simple methods to estimate the degree of redundancy without the knowledge of location or directional information. We also provide tight upper and lower bounds on the probability of complete redundancy and on the average partial redundancy. With random sensor deployment, our analysis shows that partial redundancy is more realistic for real applications, as complete redundancy is expensive, requiring up to 11 neighbouring sensors to provide a 90 percent chance of complete redundancy. Our results can be utilised in designing effective sensor scheduling algorithms to reduce energy consumption and in the mean time maintain a reasonable sensing area.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci. A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(8):102--114, August 2002.
2
3
4
5
6
7
 
8
 
9
A. Porret, T. Melly, C. Enz, and E. Vittoz. A low-power low-voltage transceiver architecture suitable for wireless distributed sensor networks. In IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (CD-ROM Proceedings), Geneva, Switzerland, May 2000.
10
 
11
S. Shakkottai, R. Srikant, and N. Shroff. Unreliable sensor grids: Coverage, connectivity and diameter. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom 2003. San Francisco, USA, March 2003.
12
 
13
A. Siegel and L. Holst. Covering the circle with random arcs of random sizes. Journal of Applied Probability, 19:373--381, 1982.
 
14
I. Stojmenovic. Position based routing in ad hoc networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 40(7):128--134, July 2002.
 
15
M. Sun and T. Lai. Computing optimal local cover set for broadcast in ad hoc networks. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pages 3291--3295. New York, USA, April 2002.
16
17
 
18
19
 
20
 
21



Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: