A semisupervised learning method to merge search engine results

ABSTRACT

The proliferation of searchable text databases on local area networks and the Internet causes the problem of finding information that may be distributed among many disjoint text databases (distributed information retrieval). How to merge the results returned by selected databases is an important subproblem of the distributed information retrieval task. Previous research assumed that either resource providers cooperate to provide normalizing statistics or search clients download all retrieved documents and compute normalized scores without cooperation from resource providers.This article presents a semisupervised learning solution to the result merging problem. The key contribution is the observation that information used to create resource descriptions for resource selection can also be used to create a centralized sample database to guide the normalization of document scores returned by different databases. At retrieval time, the query is sent to the selected databases, which return database-specific document scores, and to a centralized sample database, which returns database-independent document scores. Documents that have both a database-specific score and a database-independent score serve as training data for learning to normalize the scores of other documents. An extensive set of experiments demonstrates that this method is more effective than the well-known CORI result-merging algorithm under a variety of conditions.

REFERENCES

• 1: Javed A. Aslam , Mark Montague, Models for metasearch, Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.276-284, September 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/383952.384007]
• 2: Buckley, C., Singhal, A., Mitra, M., and Salton, G. 1995. New retrieval approaches using SMART. In Proceedings of 1995 Text REtrieval Conference (TREC-3), special publication. National Institute of Standards and Technology.
• 3: Callan, J. 2000. Distributed information retrieval. In Advances in Information Retrieval, W. B. Croft, Ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 127--150.
• 4: Jamie Callan , Margaret Connell, Query-based sampling of text databases, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.19 n.2, p.97-130, April 2001 [doi>10.1145/382979.383040]
• 5: James P. Callan , W. Bruce Croft , John Broglio, TREC and TIPSTER experiments with INQUERY, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.31 n.3, p.327-343, May-June 1995
• 6: James P. Callan , Zhihong Lu , W. Bruce Croft, Searching distributed collections with inference networks, Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.21-28, July 09-13, 1995, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/215206.215328]
• 7: Nick Craswell , Peter Bailey , David Hawking, Server selection on the World Wide Web, Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries, p.37-46, June 02-07, 2000, San Antonio, Texas, United States [doi>10.1145/336597.336628]
• 8: Craswell, N., Hawking, D., and Thistlewaite, P. 1999. Merging results from isolated search engines. In Proceedings of the 10th Australasian Database Conference. pp. 189--200.
• 9: James C. French , Allison L. Powell , Jamie Callan , Charles L. Viles , Travis Emmitt , Kevin J. Prey , Yun Mou, Comparing the performance of database selection algorithms, Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.238-245, August 15-19, 1999, Berkeley, California, United States [doi>10.1145/312624.312684]
• 10: Norbert Fuhr, A decision-theoretic approach to database selection in networked IR, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.17 n.3, p.229-249, July 1999 [doi>10.1145/314516.314517]
• 11: Luis Gravano , Chen-Chuan K. Chang , Héctor García-Molina , Andreas Paepcke, STARTS: Stanford proposal for Internet meta-searching, Proceedings of the 1997 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.207-218, May 11-15, 1997, Tucson, Arizona, United States
• 12: Luis Gravano , Héctor García-Molina , Anthony Tomasic, The effectiveness of GIOSS for the text database discovery problem, Proceedings of the 1994 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, p.126-137, May 24-27, 1994, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
• 13: Luis Gravano , Héctor García-Molina , Anthony Tomasic, GlOSS: text-source discovery over the Internet, ACM Transactions on Database Systems (TODS), v.24 n.2, p.229-264, June 1999 [doi>10.1145/320248.320252]
• 14: David Hawking , Paul Thistlewaite, Methods for information server selection, ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), v.17 n.1, p.40-76, Jan. 1999 [doi>10.1145/297117.297123]
• 15: Ipeirotis, P. and Gravano, L. 2002. Distributed search over the Hidden-Web: Hierarchical database sampling and selection. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB).
• 16: Kirsch, S. T. 2003. Document retrieval over networks wherein ranking and relevance scores are computed at the client for multiple database documents. U.S. Patent 5,659,732.
• 17: Leah S. Larkey , Margaret E. Connell , Jamie Callan, Collection selection and results merging with topically organized U.S. patents and TREC data, Proceedings of the ninth international conference on Information and knowledge management, p.282-289, November 06-11, 2000, McLean, Virginia, United States [doi>10.1145/354756.354830]
• 18: Anne Le Calvé , Jacques Savoy, Database merging strategy based on logistic regression, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.36 n.3, p.341-359, May 2000 [doi>10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00036-9 ]
• 19: Joon Ho Lee, Analyses of multiple evidence combination, Proceedings of the 20th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.267-276, July 27-31, 1997, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
• 20: Lemur Toolkit. 2003. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/∼lemur.
• 21: R. Manmatha , T. Rath , F. Feng, Modeling score distributions for combining the outputs of search engines, Proceedings of the 24th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.267-275, September 2001, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States [doi>10.1145/383952.384005]
• 22: Ogilvie, P. and Callan, J. 2001. Experiments using the Lemur toolkit. In Proceedings of 2001 Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2001), special publication. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, DC.
• 23: Jay M. Ponte , W. Bruce Croft, A language modeling approach to information retrieval, Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.275-281, August 24-28, 1998, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/290941.291008]
• 24: Allison L. Powell , James C. French , Jamie Callan , Margaret Connell , Charles L. Viles, The impact of database selection on distributed searching, Proceedings of the 23rd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.232-239, July 24-28, 2000, Athens, Greece [doi>10.1145/345508.345584]
• 25: S. E. Robertson , S. Walker, Some simple effective approximations to the 2-Poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval, Proceedings of the 17th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.232-241, July 03-06, 1994, Dublin, Ireland
• 26: Luo Si , Jamie Callan, Using sampled data and regression to merge search engine results, Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, August 11-15, 2002, Tampere, Finland [doi>10.1145/564376.564382]
• 27: Luo Si , Rong Jin , Jamie Callan , Paul Ogilvie, A language modeling framework for resource selection and results merging, Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on Information and knowledge management, November 04-09, 2002, McLean, Virginia, USA [doi>10.1145/584792.584856]
• 28: Fei Song , W. Bruce Croft, A general language model for information retrieval (poster abstract), Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.279-280, August 15-19, 1999, Berkeley, California, United States [doi>10.1145/312624.312698]
• 29: Charles L. Viles , James C. French, Dissemination of collection wide information in a distributed information retrieval system, Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.12-20, July 09-13, 1995, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/215206.215327]
• 30: Ellen M. Voorhees , Narendra K. Gupta , Ben Johnson-Laird, Learning collection fusion strategies, Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.172-179, July 09-13, 1995, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/215206.215357]
• 31: Jinxi Xu , Jamie Callan, Effective retrieval with distributed collections, Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.112-120, August 24-28, 1998, Melbourne, Australia [doi>10.1145/290941.290974]
• 32: Jinxi Xu , W. Bruce Croft, Cluster-based language models for distributed retrieval, Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval, p.254-261, August 15-19, 1999, Berkeley, California, United States [doi>10.1145/312624.312687]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval
          Subjects: Search process

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.4 Systems and Software
          Subjects: Distributed systems; Information networks

General Terms:
Algorithms, Design, Experimentation

Keywords:
Distributed information retrieval, resource ranking, resource selection, results merging, semisupervised learning method, server selection