| Constructing a virtual primary key for fingerprinting relational data |
| Full text |
Pdf
(240 KB)
|
| Source
|
ACM Workshop On Digital Rights Management
archive
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Digital rights management
table of contents
Washington, DC, USA
SESSION: Software and systems
table of contents
Pages: 133 - 141
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-786-9
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4, Downloads (12 Months): 71, Citation Count: 6
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Agrawal and Kiernan's watermarking technique for database relations [1] and Li et al's fingerprinting extension [6] both depend critically on primary key attributes. Hence, those techniques cannot embed marks in database relations without primary key attributes. Further, the techniques are vulnerable to simple attacks that alter or delete the primary key attribute.This paper proposes a new fingerprinting scheme that does not depend on a primary key attribute. The scheme constructs virtual primary keys from the most significant bits of some of each tuple's attributes. The actual attributes that are used to construct then virtual primary key differ from tuple to tuple. Attribute selection is based on a secret key that is known to the merchant only. Further, the selection does not depend on an apriori ordering over the attributes, or on knowledge of the original relation or fingerprint codeword.The virtual primary keys are then used in fingerprinting as in previous work [6]. Rigorous analysis shows that, with high probability, only embedded fingerprints can be detected and embedded fingerprints cannot be modified or erased by a variety of attacks. Attacks include adding, deleting, shuffling, or modifying tuples or attributes (including a primary key attribute if one exists), guessing secret keys, and colluding with other recipients of a relation.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
R. Agrawal and J. Kiernan. Watermarking relational databases. In Proceedings of VLDB, 2002.
|
| |
2
|
D. Boneh and J. Shaw. Collusion secure fingerprinting for digital data. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 44(5):1897--1905, 1998.
|
| |
3
|
S. Craver, N. Memon, B.-L. Yeo, and M. M. Yeung. Resolving rightful ownerships with invisible watermarking techniques: Limitations, attacks and implications. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas of Communications, 16(4):573--586, May 1998.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Y. Li, V. Swarup, and S. Jajodia. Fingerprinting relational databases. Technical report, Center for Secure Information Systems, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA, May 2003.
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read:
-
Open signaling for ATM, internet and mobile networks (OPENSIG'98)
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
29, 1
Andrew T. Campbell
, Irene Katzela
, Kazuho Miki
, John Vicente
-
Active bridging
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
27, 4
D. Scott Alexander
, Marianne Shaw
, Scott M. Nettles
, Jonathan M. Smith
-
Active electronic mail
Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on Applied computing
S. Karnouskos
, A. Vasilakos
-
Object-oriented database management system for process control systems—development and evaluation
Proceedings of the 1999 ACM symposium on Applied computing
Ryuji Wakizono
, Toshikazu Kawamura
, Takehiko Tsuchiya
, Takahiro Hatanaka
, Tatsuji Tanaka
-
Data structures for quadtree approximation and compression
Communications of the ACM
28, 9
Hanan Samet
|