ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automated analysis of P3P-enabled Web sites
Full text PdfPdf (193 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 50 archive
Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic commerce table of contents
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Pages: 326 - 338  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-788-5
Authors
Simon Byers  AT&T Labs-Research, Florham Park, NJ
Lorrie Faith Cranor  AT&T Labs-Research, Florham Park, NJ
David Kormann  AT&T Labs-Research, Florham Park, NJ
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 61,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/948005.948048
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Platform for Privacy Preferences (P3P) provides a standard computer-readable format for privacy policies and a protocol that enables web browsers to read and process these policies automatically. We developed software to query a set of web sites for P3P policies, check the validity of each policy, and analyze the information practices it describes. We used this software to analyze 588 P3P-enabled web sites found by checking for P3P policies on 5,856 web sites on 17 July 2003. The sites we checked for P3P policies were taken from several lists of popular web sites, as well as from "crawling" indexes of shopping, news, children's and government web sites. We present the first major analysis of the data practices of P3P-enabled web sites.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adkinson, W. F., Eisenach, J. A., and Lenard, T. M. Privacy online: A report on the information practices and policies of commercial web sites. Progress & Freedom Foundation, Washington, DC, 2002. http://www.pff.org/publications/privacyonlinefinalael.pdf
 
2
Cavoukian, A., and Hamilton, T. J. The Privacy Payoff: How Successful Businesses Build Customer Trust. McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto, Ontario, 2002.
 
3
4
5
 
6
Cranor, L., Byers, S., and Kormann D. An Analysis of P3P Deployment on Commercial, Government, and Children's Web Sites as of May 2003. Technical Report prepared for the 14 May 2003 Federal Trade Commission Workshop on Technologies for Protecting Personal Information. http://www.research.att.com/projects/p3p/p3p-censusmay03.pdf
 
7
Cranor, L., Langheinrich, M., Marchiori, M., Presler-Marshall, M., and Reagle, J. The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification. World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation, April 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P/
 
8
Cranor, L., Langheinrich, M., and Marchiori, M. A P3P Preference Exchange Language 1.0 (APPEL1.0). World Wide Web Consortium Working Draft, April 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-P3P-Preferences.
 
9
Cranor, L. and Reidenberg, J. Can user agents accurately represent privacy notices?. TPRC 2002 (September 2002). http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=328860
 
10
Culnan, M. J. The Georgetown Internet Privacy Policy Survey: Report to the Federal Trade Commission. Georgetwon University, Washington, DC, June 1999. http://www.msb.edu/faculty/culnanm/gippshome.html
 
11
Culnan, M. J. Privacy and the top 100 web sites: Report to the Federal Trade Commission. Georgetown University, Washington, DC, June 1999. http://www.msb.edu/faculty/culnanm/gippshome.html
 
12
Culnan, M. J. and Milne, G. R. The Culnan-Milne survey of consumers and online privacy notices. December 2001. http://intra.som.umass.edu/georgemilne/PDF_Files/culnanmilne.pdf
 
13
Dhurvasula, H., Barrowman, D., and Morse, S. Technical Issues in Implementing P3P in Netscape 7.0. November 2002. http://www.w3.org/2002/p3p-ws/pp/netscape.html
 
14
Ernst & Young. P3P Dashboard Report, August 2002. http://www.ey.com/global/download.nsf/US/P3P_Dashboard _-__August_2002/$file/P3PDashboardAugust2002.pdf
 
15
Ernst & Young. P3P Dashboard Report, January 2003. http://www.ey.com/global/download.nsf/US/P3P_Dashboard_-_January_2003/$file/E&YP3PDashboardJan2003.pdf
 
16
Esposito, D. Browser Helper Objects: The Browser the Way You Want It, MSDN Library, January 1999. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwebgen/html/bho.asp
 
17
Frank, D. OMB Honing Privacy Guidance. Federal Computer Week (14 March 2003). http://www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2003/0310/web-guide-03-13-03.asp
 
18
Federal Trade Commission. Privacy online: A report to Congress. Federal Trade Commission, Washington DC, June 1998. http://www.ftc.gov/reports/privacy3/index.htm
 
19
Federal Trade Commission. Self-regulation and privacy online: A report to Congress. Federal Trade Commission, Washington DC, July 1999. http://www.ftc.gov/os/1999/9907/index.htm#13
 
20
Federal Trade Commission. Privacy online: Fair information practices in the elctronic marketplace: A report to Congress. Federal Trade Commission, Washington DC, May 2000. http://www.ftc.gov/os/2000/05/index.htm#22
 
21
Goldfeder, A. and Leibfried, L. Privacy in Internet Explorer 6. MSDN Library, October 2001. http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/enus/dnpriv/html/ie6privacyfeature.asp
 
22
Krishnamurthy, B. and Arlitt, M. PRO-COW: Protocol Compliance on the Web---A Longitudinal Study. In Proceedings of Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, USITS 2001, (March 2001) p. 109--122. http://www.usenix.org/events/usits01/krishnamurthy.html
 
23
Milne, G. R. and Culnan, M. J. Using the Content of Online Privacy Notices to Inform Public Policy: A Longitudinal Analysis of the 1998-2002 U.S. Web Surveys. The Information Society 18, 5 (October 2002), 345--359.



REVIEW

"Myles F. McNally, III : Reviewer"

Computer ethics seeks to reduce the unintended or undesirable consequences of technology through accurate prediction. In this paper, Horner argues that predictive modeling does not provide any protection against future risk. Rather, he argues that  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Simon Byers: colleagues
Lorrie Faith Cranor: colleagues
David Kormann: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: