skip to main content
10.1145/952532.952630acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Mining confident co-location rules without a support threshold

Published:09 March 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Mining co-location patterns from spatial databases may reveal types of spatial features likely located as neighbors in space. In this paper, we address the problem of mining confident co-location rules without a support threshold. First, we propose a novel measure called the maximal participation index. We show that every confident co-location rule corresponds to a co-location pattern with a high maximal participation index value. Second, we show that the maximal participation index is non-monotonic, and thus the conventional Apriori-like pruning does not work directly. We identify an interesting weak monotonic property for the index and develop efficient algorithms to mine confident co-location rules. An extensive performance study shows that our method is both effective and efficient for large spatial databases.

References

  1. R. Agarwal and R. Srikant. Fast algorithms for Mining association rules. In VLDB'94.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. E. Cohen, M. Datar, S. Fujiwara, A. Gionis, P. Indyk, R. Motwani, J. D. Ullman, and C. Yang. Finding interesting associations without support pruning. Knowledge and Data Engineering, 13(1):64--78, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. N. Cressie. Statistics for spatial data. John Wiley and Sons, (ISBN:0471843369), 1991.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, and X. Xu. Knowledge discovery in large spatial databases: focusing techniques for efficient class identification. In SSD'95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Y. Huang, H. Xiong, S. Shekhar, and J. Pei. Mining confident co-location rules without a support threshold: A summary of results. In University of Minnesota Technical Report, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. E. M. Knorr and R. T. Ng. Extraction of spatial proximity patterns by concept generalization. In KDD'96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. K. Koperski and J. Han. Discovery of Spatial Association Rules in Geographic Information Databases. In SSD'95. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Y. Morimoto. Mining Frequent Neighboring Class Sets in Spatial Databases. In KDD'01. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. R. T. Ng and J. Han. Efficient and effective clustering methods for spatial data mining. In VLDB'94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. S. Shekhar and Y. Huang. Co-location Rules Mining: A Summary of Results. In SSTD'01.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. S. Shekhar, C. Lu, and P. Zhang. Detecting Graph-based Spatial Outliers: Algorithms and Applications. KDD'01. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Shekhar, P. Schrater, W. Raju, and W. Wu. Spatial Contextual Classification and Prediction Models for Mining Geospatial Data. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia (special issue on Multimedia Databases), 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SAC '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Applied computing
    March 2003
    1268 pages
    ISBN:1581136242
    DOI:10.1145/952532

    Copyright © 2003 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 March 2003

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate1,650of6,669submissions,25%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader