Frederic Richard
- ANSI 74 American National Standard Programming Language COBOL. X.3.23--1974, American National Standards Institute, Inc., New York (1974).Google Scholar
- DEREMER AND KRON 76 DeRemer, F., and Kron, H. Programming-in-the-large versus Programming-in-the-small. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. SE-2, No. 2 (June 1976), pp. 80--86.Google ScholarDigital Library
- DIJKSTRA 68 Dijkstra, E. W. Goto Statement Considered Harmful. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 11, No. 3 (March 1968), pp. 147--148. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ECMA/ANSI 74 European Computer Manufacturers and American National Standards Institute. PL/I. ECMA/TC10/ANSI. X3J3. BASIS 1--12 (July 1974).Google Scholar
- HOARE 72 Hoare, C. A. R. Hints on Programming Language Design. Computer Science Department, Stanford University. Technical Report STAN-CS-74-403 (December 1973), pp. 1--32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- ICHBIAH 74 Ichbiah, J. D. et al. The System Implementation Language LIS, CII, 68 route de Versailles, 78430 Louveciennes, France (December 1974).Google Scholar
- JENSEN AND WIRTH 75 Jensen, K., and Wirth, N.PASCAL User Manual and Report. Lectures Notes in Computer Science No. 18. Springer-Verlag, 2nd edition (1975). Google ScholarDigital Library
- KNUTH 67 Knuth, D. E. The Remaining Trouble Spots in Algol 60. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 10, No. 10 (October 1967), pp. 611--618. Google ScholarDigital Library
- KNUTH 74 Knuth, D. E. Structured Programming with Go To Statements. Computing Surveys, Vol. 6, No. 4 (December 1974), pp. 261--302. Google ScholarDigital Library
- LAMPSON 77 Lampson, B. W. et al. Report on the Programming Language Euclid. Sigplan Notices, Vol. 12, No. 2 (February 1977), pp. 1--79. Google ScholarDigital Library
- LEDGARD AND MARCOTTY 75 Ledgard, H. F., and Marcotty, M. A Genealogy of Control Structures. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 18, No. 11 (November 1975), pp. 629--639. Google ScholarDigital Library
- LISKOV 76 Liskov, B. An Introduction to CLU. Computation Structures Group Memo 136, Laboratory for Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (February 1976).Google Scholar
- NAUR 63 Naur, P. (Editor) Revised Report on the Algorithmic Language Algol 60. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 6, No. 1 (January 1963), pp. 1--17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- VAN WIJNGAARDEN 75 van Wijngaarden, A. et al. Revised Report on the Algorithmic Language Algol 68. Acta Informatica, Vol. 5 (1975), pp. 1--236.Google ScholarDigital Library
- WEINBERG 75 Weinberg, G. M., Geller, D. P., and Plum, T. W-s. IF-THEN-ELSE Considered Harmful. Sigplan Notices, Vol. 10, No. 8 (August 1975). Google ScholarDigital Library
- WIRTH 74 Wirth, N. On the Design of Programming Languages. Information Processing 74. North Holland Publishing Company (1974), pp. 386--393.Google Scholar
- WULF 76 Wulf, W., London, R. L., and Shaw, M. Abstraction and Verification in Alphard. New Directions in Algorithmic Languages--1975. S. A. Schuman, ed., IRIA (1976).Google Scholar
- WULF AND SHAW 73 Wulf, W., and Shaw, M. Global Variables Considered Harmful. Sigplan Notices, Vol. 8, No. 2 (Febryary 1973), pp. 28--34. Google ScholarDigital Library
- X3J3 76 American National Standards Committee X3J3. Draft proposed ANS FORTRAN. Sigplan Notices, Vol. 11, No. 3 (March 1976). Google ScholarDigital Library
Recommendations
Designing a smartpen reminder system for older adults
CHI EA '13: CHI '13 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsDesigning interactive systems for older adults often means designing with older adults from the earliest stages of development. This paper describes the co-design of a smartpen and paper calendar-based reminder system for the home. The design sessions ...
Elderly mental model of reminder system
APCHI '12: Proceedings of the 10th asia pacific conference on Computer human interactionThe growing numbers of elderly is inevitable. As we get older, we will experience some memory declines, thus an assistive technology such as reminder system is recommended. However, the uptake of reminder system is still low. Many researchers from the ...
Improving software design reasoning–A reminder card approach
Highlights- We studied design reasoning of 5 professional teams and 12 student teams.
- The ...
AbstractSoftware designers have been known to think naturalistically. This means that there may be inadequate rational thinking during software design. In the past two decades, many research works suggested that designers need to produce ...
Comments