ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Operational requirements for scalable search systems
Full text PdfPdf (295 KB)
Source Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
New Orleans, LA, USA
SESSION: Information retrieval session 8: efficiency table of contents
Pages: 435 - 442  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-723-0
Authors
Abdur Chowdhury  America Online
Greg Pass  America Online
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMIS: ACM Special Interest Group on Management Information Systems
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 53,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/956863.956945
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Prior research into search system scalability has primarily addressed query processing efficiency [1, 2, 3] or indexing efficiency [3], or has presented some arbitrary system architecture [4]. Little work has introduced any formal theoretical framework for evaluating architectures with regard to specific operational requirements, or for comparing architectures beyond simple timings [5] or basic simulations [6, 7]. In this paper, we present a framework based upon queuing network theory for analyzing search systems in terms of operational requirements. We use response time, throughput, and utilization as the key operational characteristics for evaluating performance. Within this framework, we present a scalability strategy that combines index partitioning and index replication to satisfy a given set of requirement.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
A. Arvind, C. Junghoo, G. Hector, P. Andreas, R. Sriram, "Searching the Web", Stanford Technical Report, Dec. 2000, http://dbpubs.stanford.edu/pub/2000-37.
 
6
B. Cahoon, K. McKinley, "Evaluating the Performance of Distributed Architectures for Information Retrieval using a Variety of Workloads", ACM Transactions on Information Systems, (1997).
 
7
8
 
9
N. Goharian, T. El-Ghazawi, D. Grossman, A. Chowdhury, "On the Enhancements of a Sparse Matrix Information Retrieval Approach", PDPTA, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2000.
 
10
H. Williams, J. Zobel, P. Anderson, "What's Next? Index Structures for Efficient Phrase Querying", Australasian Database Conference 1999: 141-152.
 
11
D. Bahle, H. Williams, J. Zobel, "Compaction Techniques for Nextword Indexes", SPIRE 2001: 33--45.
12
 
13
 
14
H. Williams, J. Zobel, "Compressing Integers for Fast File Access". The Computer Journal 42(3): 193--201 (1999).
15
16
17
 
18
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
A. Moffat, J. Zobel: "Information Retrieval Systems for Large Document Collections". TREC 1994.
23
 
24
25
26
 
27
 
28
29
 
30
 
31
Peter Bailey and David Hawking, A Parallel Architecture for Query Processing Over a Terabyte of Text, Department of Computer Science, Technical Report TR-CS-96-04, (June 1996).
32
 
33
B. Cahoon K. McKinley, "Evaluating the Performance of Distributed Architectures for Information Retrieval using a Variety of Workloads", ACM Transactions on Information Systems, (1997).
34
 
35
 
36
37
38
 
39
R. Jain, "The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling," Wiley- Interscience, New York, NY, April 1991.
40
41
 
42

CITED BY  7
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Abdur Chowdhury: colleagues
Greg Pass: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: