ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Increasing workplace independence for people with cognitive disabilities by leveraging distributed cognition among caregivers and clients
Full text PdfPdf (657 KB)
Source Conference on Supporting Group Work archive
Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work table of contents
Sanibel Island, Florida, USA
SESSION: Groupware for special groups II table of contents
Pages: 95 - 104  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-693-5
Authors
Stefan Carmien  University of Colorado
Rogerio DePaula  University of Colorado
Andrew Gorman  University of Colorado
Anja Kintsch  University of Colorado
Sponsors
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 51,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/958160.958176
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe a current group configuration that is used to support people with cognitive disabilities (hereinafter referred to as "clients") in the workplace. A client receiving face-to-face, often one-to-one assistance from a dedicated human job coach is characteristic of this "traditional" model. We compare this traditional model with other group configurations that are used in cooperative and distributed work practices. In so doing, we highlight requirements that are unique to task support for people with cognitive disabilities. A survey of technologies that have been developed to provide clients with greater levels of independence is then presented. These endeavors often attempt to replace human job coaches with computational cognitive aids. We discuss some limitations of such approaches and then present a model and prototype that extends the computational job coach by incorporating human caregivers in a distributed one-to-many support system.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baesman, B. and Baesman, N. Visions System website available at: www.thevisionssystem.com, 2003.
 
2
Braddock, D. Public financial support for disability at the dawn of the 21st century. in Braddock, D. ed. Disability at the dawn of the 21st century and the state of the states, American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC, 2002, 65--76.
 
3
Braddock, D. and Parish, S. An Institutional Hisotry of Disability. in Braddock, D. ed. Disability at the Dawn of the 21st Century and The State of the States, American Association on Mental Retardation, Washington, DC, 2002, 3--61.
 
4
Carmien, S., MAPS: Dynamic scaffolding for independence for persons with cognitive impairments. in 9th International Conference on User Modeling (UM'2003), (University of Pittsburgh at Johnstown, USA, 2003), Springer-Verlag Heidelberg, 408--410.
 
5
 
6
 
7
Davies, D. K. Ablelink Technologies Website available at: www.ablelinktech.com, Ablelink Technologies, 2003.
 
8
Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. and Vähäaho, T. When the Center Doesn't Hold: The Importance of Knotworking. in Jensen, U. ed. Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-Historical Approaches, Aarhus University Press, Aarhus, Denmark, 1999.
 
9
Fischer, G., Ehn, P., Engeström, Y. and Virkkunen, J., Symmetry of Ignorance and Informed Participation. in Proceedings of the Participatory Design Conference (PDC'02), (Malmö University, Sweden, 2002), CPSR, 426--428.
 
10
Fischer, G. and Sullivan, J. F., Human-Centered Public Transportation Systems for Persons with Cognitive Disabilities - Challenges and Insights for Participatory Design. in 7th Participatory Design Conference, (Malmö, Sweden, 2002), 194--198.
 
11
Han, R. MANTIS Website available at mantis.cs.colorado.edu, 2003.
 
12
Jönsson, B. Isaac project, Certec, 2003.
 
13
 
14
LaPlante, M. E., Hendershot, G. E. and Moss., A. J. The prevalence of need for assistive technology devices and home accessibility features. Technology and Disability, 6. 17--28.
 
15
 
16
 
17
Norman, D. A. The Design of Everyday Things. Currency Doubleday, New York, 1990.
 
18
Rizzolo, M. C. Personal Communication Regarding "Public financial support for disability at the dawn of the 21st century", Boulder, CO, 2003.
 
19
Russel, J. N., Hendershot, G. E., LeClerer, F., Jean, H., & Adler, M. Trends and Differential Use of Assistive Technology Devices: United States: 1994: Advanced Data From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention - National Center for Health Statistics, 1997.
 
20
Salomon, G. (ed.), Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1993.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Stefan Carmien: colleagues
Rogerio DePaula: colleagues
Andrew Gorman: colleagues
Anja Kintsch: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: