Information seeking and sharing in design teams

ABSTRACT

Information retrieval is generally considered an individual activity, and information retrieval research and tools reflect this view. As digitally mediated communication and information sharing increase, collaborative information retrieval merits greater attention and support. We describe field studies of information gathering in two design teams that had very different products, disciplinary backgrounds, and tools. We found striking similarities in the kinds of information they sought and the methods used to get it. For example, each team sought information about design constraints from external sources. A common strategy was to propose ideas and request feedback, rather than to ask directly for recommendations. Some differences in information seeking and sharing reflected differences in work contexts. Our findings suggest some ways that existing team collaboration tools could support collaborative information retrieval more effectively.

REFERENCES

• 1: Agostini, A., De Michelis, G., and Grasso, M. A. Rethinking CSCW systems: the architecture of MILANO, Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 1997), Kluwer, pp. 33--48.
• 2: Allen, T. J. Managing the Flow of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1977.
• 3: Belkin, N. Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval, Canadian Journal of Information Science, Vol. 5, 1980, pp. 133--143.
• 4: Büscher, M., Mogensen, P., and Shapiro, D. Spaces of practice, Proc. ECSCW 2001, Kluwer , pp. 139--158.
• 5: Dervin, B. From the mind's eye of the user: the sense-making qualitative-quantitative methodology, in J.D. Glazier & R.R. Powell (Eds.), Qualitative Research in Information Management. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, Colorado, 1992, pp. 61--84.
• 6: Fidel, R., Bruce, H., Pejtersen, A. Dumais, S., Grudin, J., and Poltrock, S. Collaborative information retrieval, in L. Höglund (Ed.), The New Review of Information Behavior Research: Studies of Information Seeking in Context. Graham Taylor, 2000.
• 7: Fidel, R., Pejtersen, A. M., Cleal, B. & Bruce, H. A multi-dimensional approach to the study of human-information interaction: A case study of collaborative information retrieval. Unpublished paper, 2003.
• 8: Groth, K. & Bowers, J. On finding things out: Situating organizational knowledge in CSCW, Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2001), Kluwer, pp. 279--298.
• 9: David W. McDonald , Mark S. Ackerman, Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture, Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, p.231-240, December 2000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/358916.358994]
• 10: McGrath, J. E. Groups: Interaction and Performance. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs NJ, 1984.
• 11: Mortensen, M. & Hinds, P. Fuzzy teams: Boundary disagreement in distributed and collocated teams, in P. J. Hinds, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Distributed Work, MIT Press, Cambridge, 2002.
• 12: Pejtersen, A. M., Sonnenwald, D. H., Buur, J., Govindarej, T., and Vicente, K. Using cognitive engineering theory to support knowledge exploration in design, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference in Engineering Design (Praha, August 1995).
• 13: Poltrock, S. E., and Engelbeck, G. Requirements for a virtual collaboration environment', Information and Software Technology, Vol. 41, No. 6, 1999, pp. 331--340.
• 14: Jens Rasmussen , Annelise Mark Pejtersen , L. P. Goodstein, Cognitive systems engineering, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1994
• 15: Madhu Reddy , Paul Dourish, A finger on the pulse: temporal rhythms and information seeking in medical work, Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 16-20, 2002, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA [doi>10.1145/587078.587126]
• 16: Reddy, M. C., Dourish, P., and Pratt, W. Coordinating heterogeneous work: Information and representation in medical care. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW 2001), Kluwer, pp. 239--258.
• 17: Schmidt, K, and Bannon, L. Taking CSCW seriously: supporting articulation work, Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Vol. 1, 1992, pp. 7--40.
• 18: Diane H. Sonnenwald , Leah A. Lievrouw, Collaboration during the design process: a case study of communication, information behavior, and project performance, Proceedings of an international conference on Information seeking in context, p.179-204, August 1997, Tampere, Finland
• 19: Diane H. Sonnenwald , Linda G. Pierce, Information behavior in dynamic group work contexts: interwoven situational awareness, dense social networks and contested collaboration in command and control, Information Processing and Management: an International Journal, v.36 n.3, p.461-479, May 2000 [doi>10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00039-4 ]
• 20: Taylor, R. S. Question-negotiation and information seeking in libraries, College and Research Libraries, Vol. 29, 1968, pp. 178--194.
• 21: Kim J. Vicente, Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 1999

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.3 INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL
      H.3.3 Information Search and Retrieval

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces
          Subjects: Computer-supported cooperative work; Collaborative computing

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors

Keywords:
collaborative design, collaborative information retrieval