skip to main content
article

Modeling TCP-vegas under on/off traffic

Published:01 September 2003Publication History
First page image

References

  1. T. Bonald. Comparison of TCP Reno and TCP Vegas via fluid approximation. Technical Report RR-3563, INRIA, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Boutremans. and J. L. Boudec. A note on the fairness of TCP Vegas. In Proc. of International Zurich Seminar on Broadband Communications, pages 163--170, Feb. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. T. Bu. and D. Towsley. Fixed point approximations for TCP behavior in an AQM network. In Proc. of ACM Sigmetrics, pages 216--225, Jun. 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Casetti and M. Meo. A new approach to model the stationary behavior of TCP connections. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, pages 367--375, March 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. C. Casetti and M. Meo. An analytical framework for the performance evaluation of TCP Reno connections. Computer Networks, 37:669--682, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. V. Firoiu and M. Borden. A study of active queue management for congestion control. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1435--1444, Mar. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. V. Firoiu, I. Yeom, and X. Zhang. A framework for practical performance evaluation and traffic engineering in IP networks. In Proc. of IEEE ICT, Jun. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Gibbens, S. Sargood, C. V. Eijl, F. Kelly, H. Azmoodeh, R. Macfadyen, and N. Macfadyen. Fixed-point models for the end-to-end performance analysis of IP networks In 13th ITC Special Seminar, Sep. 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G. Hasegawa, M. Murata, and H. Miyahara. Fairness and stability of congestion control mechanisms of TCP. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1329--1336, Mar. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. I. Kaj and J. Olsén. Stochastic equilibrium modeling of the TCP dynamics in various AQM environments. In Proc. of SPECTS, pages 481--493, Jul. 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Kumar. Comparative performance analysis of versions of TCP in a local network with a lossy link. IEEE/ACM Trans./Networking, 6:485--498, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Low, L. Peterson, and L. Wang. Understanding TCP Vegas: A duality model. In Proc. of ACM Sigmetrics, pages 226--235, Jun 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. A. Misra, T. Ott, and J. Baras. The window distribution of multiple TCPs with random queues. In Proc. of IEEE GLOBECOM, pages 1714--1726, Dec. 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. V. Misra, W.-B.Gong, and D. F. Towsley. Fluid-based analysis of a network of AQM routers supporting TCP flows with an application to RED. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 30:151--160, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. J. Mo, R. La, V. Anantharam, and J. Walrand. Analysis and comparison of TCP Reno and Vegas. In Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, pages 1556--1563, Mar 1999.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. J. Olsén. Stochastic Modeling and Simulation of the TCP Protocol. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University, Sweden, Oct. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, and J. Kurose. Modeling TCP throughput: a simple model and its empirical validation. ACM Computer Communication Review, 28:303--314, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. M. Roughan, A. Erramilli, and D. Veitch Network performance for TCP networks part I: Persistent sources. In Proc. of the International Teletraffic Congress-ITC-17, pages 24--28, Sep. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. C. Samios and M. Vernon. Modeling the throughput of TCP Vegas. In Proc. of ACM Sigmetrics, pages 71--81, Jun. 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. A. Wierman, T. Osogami, and J. Olsén. A unified framework for modeling TCP-Vegas, TCP-SACK, and TCP-Reno. In Proc. of International Symposium on Modeling, Analysis, and Simulation of Computer and Telecommunication Systems, Oct. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review
    ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review  Volume 31, Issue 2
    Special issue on the fifth workshop on MAthematical performance Modeling and Analysis (MAMA 2003)
    September 2003
    40 pages
    ISSN:0163-5999
    DOI:10.1145/959143
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Copyright © 2003 Authors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 September 2003

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader