Judy Sheard
Martin Dick
ABSTRACT
This paper presents an analysis of results of a survey of graduate students in IT courses that aimed to gain an understanding of their views of cheating and knowledge of their cheating practice. The survey was part of an investigation into the cheating behaviour of IT students within the Faculty of Information Technology of Monash University. Using a factor analysis technique, categories of cheating behaviour and categories of reasons that could cause cheating or prevent cheating were identified. These were then used to determine possible influences on different types of cheating behaviour. A search of the literature has shown that there is a scarcity of studies of cheating behaviour of IT students, especially at the graduate level. The results of this study are informing an education program and development of policy on student cheating within our Faculty.
- Bowers, W. J., Student Dishonesty and its Control in College. Columbia University, New York, 1964.Google Scholar
- Brown, B., The academic ethics of graduate business students: a survey, Journal of education for Business, 70 (1995) 151--156.Google Scholar
- Davis, S. F. and Ludvigson, H. W., Faculty Forum: Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation, Teaching of Psychology, 22 (1995) 119--121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dick, M., Sheard, J. and Markham, S., Is it OK to cheat? ITiCSE 2001, Canterbury, UK, 2001.Google Scholar
- Dick, M., Sheard, J. and Markham, S., Why do students cheat?, ICCE 2001, Seoul, Korea, 2001.Google Scholar
- Ferrell, C. and Daniel, L., A frame of reference for understanding behaviors related to the academic misconduct of undergraduate teacher education students, Research in Higher Education, 36 (1995) 345--375.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O'Brien, K. and Steffen, S., Cheating at small colleges: an examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviours, Journal of College Student Development, 35 (1994) 255--260.Google Scholar
- Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E. and Clark, R. E., College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralising attitude, Research in Higher Education, 25 (1986) 342--354.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lipson, A. and McGavern, N., Undergraduate academic dishonesty at MIT. Results of a study of attitudes and behaviour of undergraduates. 1993.Google Scholar
- Love, P. G., The meaning and mediated nature of cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. Association for the Study of Higher Education, Albuqueque, New Mexico, 1997, pp. 1--17.Google Scholar
- Maramark, S. and Maline, M. B., Academic dishonesty among college students. Issues in education., Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC, 1993.Google Scholar
- Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Strokes, A. and Armstead, P., Individual differences in student cheating, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88 (1996) 229--241.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Influences on cheating practice of graduate students in IT courses: what are the factors?
Recommendations
Cheating and plagiarism: perceptions and practices of first year IT students
ITiCSE '02: Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationA study of cheating and plagiarism using a scenario based format, has provided an insight into attitudes towards questionable work practices of first year information technology students' within the School of Computer Science and Software Engineering of ...
Influences on cheating practice of graduate students in IT courses: what are the factors?
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science educationThis paper presents an analysis of results of a survey of graduate students in IT courses that aimed to gain an understanding of their views of cheating and knowledge of their cheating practice. The survey was part of an investigation into the cheating ...
Visual secret sharing with cheating prevention revisited
Visual secret sharing (VSS) is a variant form of secret sharing, and is efficient since secret decoding only depends on the human vision system. However, cheating in VSS, first showed by Horng et al., is a significant issue like a limelight. Since then, ...
Reviews
Kipp Jones
Sheard and Dick attempt to address the dearth of quality research related directly to the factors influencing cheating within the graduate information technology student body. Through this research, the authors attempt to identify not only the types or "quality" of unethical behavior, but also what factors influence this behavior. The end result indicates some courses of action that may help educators and students reduce the amount of academic misconduct. The research used a questionnaire to gather the data. From this data, a series of factor analyses were conducted to isolate the four major categories of cheating (from unacceptable assistance to exam cheating), as well as positive and negative factors that influence cheating behavior. The study was conducted over a single student body of 112 graduate information technology (IT) students. While this by no means invalidates the research findings, it should be validated against a larger and more diverse set of campus student bodies, to eliminate factors that may be isolated to a single campus or student body. Another factor that would be interesting to explore would be the correlation between students who were guilty of "major" cheating, and those that were also involved in one or more of the "minor" cheating categories. Interestingly, more than ten percent of students admitted to engaging in serious forms of cheating. This result should certainly raise interest in the associated factors that appear to influence this behavior, which included grade improvement and other external factors, as well as workload pressures. Faculty and students alike would do well to understand and address these issues, and researchers should continue to explore this topic to expand our overall understanding of this problem. Online Computing Reviews Service
Access critical reviews of Computing literature here
Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.
Comments