ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Influences on cheating practice of graduate students in IT courses: what are the factors?
Full text PdfPdf (328 KB)
Source Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 8th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education table of contents
Thessaloniki, Greece
SESSION: Evaluation & assessment table of contents
Pages: 45 - 49  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:1-58113-672-2
Also published in ...
Authors
Judy Sheard  Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Martin Dick  Monash University Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sponsor
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 67,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/961511.961527
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper presents an analysis of results of a survey of graduate students in IT courses that aimed to gain an understanding of their views of cheating and knowledge of their cheating practice. The survey was part of an investigation into the cheating behaviour of IT students within the Faculty of Information Technology of Monash University. Using a factor analysis technique, categories of cheating behaviour and categories of reasons that could cause cheating or prevent cheating were identified. These were then used to determine possible influences on different types of cheating behaviour. A search of the literature has shown that there is a scarcity of studies of cheating behaviour of IT students, especially at the graduate level. The results of this study are informing an education program and development of policy on student cheating within our Faculty.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bowers, W. J., Student Dishonesty and its Control in College. Columbia University, New York, 1964.
 
2
Brown, B., The academic ethics of graduate business students: a survey, Journal of education for Business, 70 (1995) 151--156.
 
3
Davis, S. F. and Ludvigson, H. W., Faculty Forum: Additional data on academic dishonesty and a proposal for remediation, Teaching of Psychology, 22 (1995) 119--121.
 
4
Dick, M., Sheard, J. and Markham, S., Is it OK to cheat? ITiCSE 2001, Canterbury, UK, 2001.
 
5
Dick, M., Sheard, J. and Markham, S., Why do students cheat?, ICCE 2001, Seoul, Korea, 2001.
 
6
Ferrell, C. and Daniel, L., A frame of reference for understanding behaviors related to the academic misconduct of undergraduate teacher education students, Research in Higher Education, 36 (1995) 345--375.
 
7
Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O'Brien, K. and Steffen, S., Cheating at small colleges: an examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviours, Journal of College Student Development, 35 (1994) 255--260.
 
8
Haines, V. J., Diekhoff, G. M., LaBeff, E. E. and Clark, R. E., College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralising attitude, Research in Higher Education, 25 (1986) 342--354.
 
9
Lipson, A. and McGavern, N., Undergraduate academic dishonesty at MIT. Results of a study of attitudes and behaviour of undergraduates. 1993.
 
10
Love, P. G., The meaning and mediated nature of cheating and plagiarism among graduate students in a college of education. Association for the Study of Higher Education, Albuqueque, New Mexico, 1997, pp. 1--17.
 
11
Maramark, S. and Maline, M. B., Academic dishonesty among college students. Issues in education., Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC, 1993.
 
12
Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Strokes, A. and Armstead, P., Individual differences in student cheating, Journal of Educational Psychology, 88 (1996) 229--241.


REVIEW

"Kipp Jones : Reviewer"

Sheard and Dick attempt to address the dearth of quality research related directly to the factors influencing cheating within the graduate information technology student body. Through this research, the authors attempt to identify not only the typ  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Judy Sheard: colleagues
Martin Dick: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: