ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A collaborative intelligent tutoring system for medical problem-based learning
Full text PdfPdf (857 KB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
Funchal, Madeira, Portugal
SESSION: Intelligent tutoring table of contents
Pages: 14 - 21  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-815-6
Authors
Siriwan Suebnukarn  Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand
Peter Haddawy  Asian Institute of Technology, Pathumthani, Thailand
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 125,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/964442.964447
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper describes COMET, a collaborative intelligent tutoring system for medical problem-based learning. The system uses Bayesian networks to model individual student knowledge and activity, as well as that of the group. It incorporates a multi-modal interface that integrates text and graphics so as to provide a rich communication channel between the students and the system, as well as among students in the group. Students can sketch directly on medical images, search for medical concepts, and sketch hypotheses on a shared workspace. The prototype system incorporates substantial domain knowledge in the area of head injury diagnosis. A major challenge in building COMET has been to develop algorithms for generating tutoring hints. Tutoring in PBL is particularly challenging since the tutor should provide as little guidance as possible while at the same time not allowing the students to get lost. From studies of PBL sessions at a local medical school, we have identified and implemented eight commonly used hinting strategies. We compared the tutoring hints generated by COMET with those of experienced human tutors. Our results show that COMET's hints agree with the hints of the majority of the human tutors with a high degree of statistical agreement (McNemar test, p = 0.652, Kappa = 0.773).


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Barrows, H. S. A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481--486, 1986.
 
2
 
3
Suthers, D., Toth, E., and Weiner, A. An Integrated Approach to Implementing Collaborative Inquiry in the Classroom. Proceedings of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 272--279, 1997.
 
4
Martha, W., et al. CIRCSIM-Tutor: An Intelligent Tutoring System Using Natural Language Dialogue. Proceedings of Midwest AI and Cognitive Science Conference, 16--23, 2001.
 
5
Martens, A., Bernauer, J., Illmann, T., and Seitz, A. Docs 'n Drugs - The Virtual Polyclinic. An Intelligent Tutoring System for Web-Based and Case-Oriented Training in Medicine. Proceedings of the AMIA Fall Symposium, 2001.
 
6
Jameson, A., Baldes, S., and Kleinbauer, T. Generative Models of Group Members as Support for Group Collaboration. Workshop on User and Group Models for Web-Based Adaptive Collaborative Environments Proceedings of the International Conference on User Modeling, 1--14, 2003.
 
7
Lock, Z., and Kudenko, D. Multi-component User Models of Team Members. Workshop on User and Group Models for Web-Based Adaptive Collaborative Environments, in International Conference on User Modeling, 25--34, 2003.
 
8
Masthoff, J. Modeling a group of television viewers. Proceedings of the Workshop Future tv, in Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference, 34--42, 2002.
 
9
Diana, H. J. M., et. al. Relationship of tutors' group-dynamics skills to their performance rating in problem-based learning. Academic Medicine, 76, 473--476, 2001.
 
10
Das, M., Mpofu, D. F. S., Hasan, M. Y., and Stewart, T. S. Student perceptions of tutor skills in problem-based learning tutorials. Medical Education 36, 272--278, 2002.
 
11
Feltovich, P. J., and Barrows, H. S. Issues of generality in medical problem solving. In H. G. Schmidt and M. L. De Volder (Eds.) Tutorials in problem-based learning: A new direction in teaching the health professions. The Netherlands: Van Gorcum, 1984.
 
12
 
13
Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., and Scheines, R. Causation, prediction, and search. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
 
14
Dawson, B., and Trapp, R. G. Basic & Clinical Biostatistics. 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, 2001.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Siriwan Suebnukarn: colleagues
Peter Haddawy: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: