skip to main content
10.1145/96877.96887acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissacConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

A decidable fragment of the elementary theory of relations and some applications

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 July 1990Publication History

ABSTRACT

The class of purely universal formulae of the elementary theory of relations with equality is shown to have an NP-complete satisfiability problem, under the assumption that there is an a priori bound on the length of quantifier prefixes and the arities of relation variables. In the second part of the paper we discuss possible applications in the field of theorem proving in set and graph theory and of consistency checking for queries in relational databases.

References

  1. BDL89.N. Baxter, E. Dubinsky, and G. Levin. Learning discrete mathematics with iSETL. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ber58.C. Berge. Theorie des graphs et ses applications. Dunod, Paris, 1958.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. BFOS81.M. Breban, A. Ferro, E. Omodeo, and J. T. Schwartz. Decision procedures for elementary sublanguages of set theory II. Formulas involving restricted quantifiers, together with ordinal, integer, map, and domain notions. Comm. Pure App. Math., 34:177-195, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bol79.B. Bollobas. Graph Theory: an introductory ourse. Springer Verlag, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CCP89.D. Cantone, V. Cutello, and A. Policriti. Settheoretic reductions of Hilbert's tenth problem. In Proceedings of Logic and Computer Science Workshop. Lecture notes in Computer Science, 1989. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. CFO89.D. Cantone, A. Ferro, and E.G. Omodeo. Computable set theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. CFS87.D. Cantone, A. Ferro, and J. T. Schwartz. Decision procedures for elementary sublanguages of set theory V. Multilcvel syllogistic extended by the general union operator. journal of Computer and Sysiem Sciences., 34 (l):l-18, ~gs?. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. CH80.A.K. Chandra and D. Hare}. Computable queries for relational data bases. Journal of Computers and System Sciences, 21:156-178, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. CM77.A.K. Chandra and P.M. Merlin. Optimal implementation of conjunctive queries in relational databases. In Proc. Ninth Annual A CM Syrup. on the Theory of Computing, pages 77-90, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Cod72.E.F. Codd. Relational completeness of data base sublanguages. In Rustin, editor, Data Base Systems, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1972. Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. COP89.D. Cantone, E. Omodeo, and A. Policriti. The Automation of Syllogistic II. Optimization and Complexity Issues. Journal of Automated Reasoning, i989. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. CS89.D. Cantone and J.T. Schwartz. Decision procedures for elementary sublanguages of set theory. XI. Multilevel syllogistic extended by some elementary map constructs. Journal of Auiomated Reasoning, 1989. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. DG79.B. Dreben and W.D. Goldfarb. The decision problem. Solvable classes of quantificational formulas. Addison-Wesley Publ. Comp. Inc., Reading, Massachusetts, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. FO78.A. Ferro and E.G. Omodeo. An efficient validity test for formulae in extensional twolevel syllogistic. Le Matemaiiche (Caiania, Italy), 33:130-137, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Gol84.W.D. Goldfarb. The Godel class with identity is unsolvable. Bull. of A.M.S., 10 (1):113- 115, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Mos88.L.E. Moser. A decision procedures for unquantified formulas of graph theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 310:344-357, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Mos89.L.E. Moser. Decidability of formulas in graph theory. Fundamenta Informalicae, 12(2):163- 180, 1989.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. PP89.F. Parlamento and A. Policriti. Decision procedures for elementary sublanguages of set theory XIII. Model graphs, reflection and decidability. Journal o/Automated Reasoning, 1989. To appear. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Sch79.W. Schoenfeld. An undecidability result for relation algebras. J. Symb. Logic, 44(1):111- 115, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. SDDS86.J.T. Schwartz, R.B.K. Dewar, E. Dubinsky, and E. Schonberg. Programming with sets: An introduction to SETL. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Sup72.P. Suppes. Axiomatic set theory. Dover Publications, Inc, New York, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Tar41.A. Tarski. On the calculus of relations. J. Symb. Logic, 6(3):73-89, 1941.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Tar53.A. Tarski. Some metalogical results concerning the calculus of relations. J. Symb. Logic, 18(3):188-189, 1953.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Ull88.J.D. Ullman. Principles of database and Knowledge-base systems, Volumes 1,2. Computer Science Press, Rockville, Maryland, 1988. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A decidable fragment of the elementary theory of relations and some applications

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          ISSAC '90: Proceedings of the international symposium on Symbolic and algebraic computation
          July 1990
          307 pages
          ISBN:0201548925
          DOI:10.1145/96877

          Copyright © 1990 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 July 1990

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate395of838submissions,47%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader