ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Designing minimal documentation using a GOMS model: a usability evaluation of an engineering approach
Full text PdfPdf (1.02 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people table of contents
Seattle, Washington, United States
Pages: 99 - 107  
Year of Publication: 1990
ISBN:0-201-50932-6
Authors
Richard Gong  Center for Ergonomics, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Jay Elkerton  Center for Ergonomics, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 22,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/97243.97261
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Minimal Manual proposed by Carroll, Smith-Kerker, Ford, and Mazur [6] has been demonstrated to improve the performance of novices learning a word processing system. However, little research exists to suggest a practical methodology for implementing the important features of a minimal manual. Using the GOMS model, we incrementally modified a manual to include certain minimal manual features: reduced verbiage, focus on real tasks, and error recovery support. An evaluation of the manuals with novice users demonstrated significant improvements in learning performance when the manual was modified to be task-oriented with explicit procedural steps for accomplishing real tasks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Cart'oll, J, M. (1984a). Minimalist training. Datamation, 30 (18), 125-136.
 
5
Carroll, J. M, (1984b). Minimalist design for active users. In Shackel, B. (ed.), Human-Computer Interaction - IN- TERACT '84 (pp. 39 - 44). New York: North-Holland.
 
6
Carroll, J. M., Smith-Kerker, P. L., Ford, J. R., and Mazur, S. A. (1986). The Minimal manual (Technical Report RC 11637 #52295). Yorktown Heights, NY" IBM Watson Research Center.
 
7
Catrambone, R. (in press). Specific versus general procedures in instructions. Human-Computer Interaction.
 
8
Elkerton, J. (1988). Online aiding for human-computer interfaces. In Helander, M. (ed.), Handbook of Human- Corr~uter Interaction (pp. 345-364). New York: North- Holland.
 
9
Elkerton, J. and Palmiter, S. (1989). Designing help systems using a GOMS model: Part I - an information retrieval evaluation (Technical Report C4E-ONR-3). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Ergonomics, The University of Michigan.
 
10
Kieras, D. E. (1988). Towards a practical GOMS model methodology for user interact design. In Helander, M. (ed.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 135- 157). New York: North-Holland.
 
11
The University of Michigan (1988). User's manual for the two dimensional static strength prediction program. Ann Arbor, MI.
 
12
Wright, P. (1988). Issues of content and presentation in documentdesign. In Helander, M. (ed.),HandbookofHuman-Computer Interaction (pp. 629 - 652). New York: North-Holland.

CITED BY  9
 
 

Collaborative Colleagues:
Richard Gong: colleagues
Jay Elkerton: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: