ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Affective sensors, privacy, and ethical contracts
Full text PdfPdf (203 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Vienna, Austria
SESSION: Late breaking result papers table of contents
Pages: 1103 - 1106  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-703-6
Authors
Carson Reynolds  MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Rosalind Picard  MIT Media Laboratory, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 58,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/985921.985999
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Sensing affect raises critical privacy concerns, which are examined here using ethical theory, and with a study that illuminates the connection between ethical theory and privacy. We take the perspective that affect sensing systems encode a designer's ethical and moral decisions: which emotions will be recognized, who can access recognition results, and what use is made of recognized emotions. Previous work on privacy has argued that users want feedback and control over such ethical choices. In response, we develop ethical contracts from the theory of contractualism, which grounds moral decisions on mutual agreement. Current findings indicate that users report significantly more respect for privacy in systems with an ethical contract when compared to a control.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Picard, R. W. and Klein, J. (2002). Computers that Recognise and Respond to User Emotion: Theoretical and Practical Implications. Interacting with Computers, 14(2) (2002), 141--169.
 
2
DARPA SB032-038 TITLE: Integrated System for Emotional State Recognition for the Enhancement of Human Performance and Detection of Criminal Intent. http://www.dodsbir.net/solicitation/darpa032.htm
 
3
Reynolds, C. (2001) The Sensing and Measurement of Frustration with Computers. Master's thesis, MIT.
 
4
Moor, J. H. (1985). What is computer ethics? Metaphilosophy, 28(3) 266--275.
 
5
Cudd, A. (2000). Contractarianism. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianism
6
 
7
Cranor, L. and Reagle, J. (1998). Designing a Social Protocol: Lessons Learned from the Platform for Privacy Preferences Project, in J. K. MacKie-Mason and D. Waterman (eds.) Telephony, the Internet, and the Media. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1998.
 
8
Debian Social Contract http://www.debian.org/social_contract


Collaborative Colleagues:
Carson Reynolds: colleagues
Rosalind Picard: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: