ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An improved slicer for Java
Full text PdfPdf (180 KB)
Source Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT workshop on Program analysis for software tools and engineering table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Evaluation table of contents
Pages: 17 - 22  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-910-1
Authors
Christian Hammer  Universität Passau
Gregor Snelting  Universität Passau
Sponsors
SIGPLAN: ACM Special Interest Group on Programming Languages
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 36,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/996821.996830
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present an improved slicing algorithm for Java. The best algorithm known so far, first presented in [11], is not always precise if nested objects are used as actual parameters. The new algorithm presented in this paper always generates correct and precise slices, but is more expensive in general.We describe the algorithms and their treatment of objects as parameters. In particular, we present a new, safe criterion for termination of unfolding nested parameter objects. We then compare the two algorithms by providing measurements for a benchmark of Java and JavaCard programs.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
C. S. Ananian. The static single information form. Master's thesis, MIT, September 1999. Tech. Report MIT-LCS-TR-801.
 
2
P. Bieber, J. Cazin, A. E. Marouani, P. Girard, J.-L. Lanet, V. Wiels, and G. Zanon. The PACAP prototype: a tool for detecting Java Card illegal flow. In Java Card Forum Cannes, France, Sept. 2000.
 
3
M. B. Dwyer and J.Hatcliff. Slicing software for model construction. In Partial Evaluation and Semantic-Based Program Manipulation pages 105--118, 1999.
4
5
 
6
G. Kovács, F. Magyar, and T. Gyimóthy. Static slicing of java programs. Technical Report TR-96-108, József Attila University, Hungary, 1996.
 
7
J. Krinke. Advanced Slicing of Sequential and Concurrent Programs PhD thesis, Univ.of Passau, Germany, 2003.
8
 
9
 
10
O. Lhoták. Spark: A flexible points-to analysis framework for java. Master's thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada, February 2003.
 
11
12
13
 
14
15
16
 
17
A. Sabelfeld and A. Myers. Language-based information-flow security. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 21(1), January 2003.
 
18
G.Snelting, T. Robschink, and J. Krinke. Efficient path conditions in dependence graphs for software safety analysis. Submitted for publication, 2003.
 
19
T. Teitelbaum. Code surfer user guide and reference. Technical report, Gramma Tech Product Documentation, 2001. http://www.grammatech.com/csurf-doc/manual.html.
 
20
F. Tip. A survey of program slicing techniques. Journal of Programming Languages 3(3):121--189, Sept. 1995.
21
22
 
23
N. Walkinshaw, M.Roper, and M. Wood. The java system dependence graph. In SCAM 2003.
 
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Christian Hammer: colleagues
Gregor Snelting: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read:
  • LR Parsing ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)   6, 2
    A. V. Aho ,  S. C. Johnson