ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
On locally Delaunay geometric graphs
Full text PdfPdf (143 KB)
Source Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry archive
Proceedings of the twentieth annual symposium on Computational geometry table of contents
Brooklyn, New York, USA
SESSION: Session 11 table of contents
Pages: 378 - 382  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-885-7
Authors
Rom Pinchasi  MIT, Cambridge, MA
Shakhar Smorodinsky  Institute for Theoretical Computer Science, ETH, Zurich
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGACT: ACM Special Interest Group on Algorithms and Computation Theory
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues   peer to peer  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
Save this Article to a Binder    Display Formats: BibTex  EndNote ACM Ref   
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/997817.997874
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A geometric graph is a simple graph G=(V,E) with an embedding of the set V in the plane such that the points that represent V are in general position. A geometric graph is said to be k-locally Delaunay (or a Dk-graph) if for each edge (u,v)E there is a (Euclidean) disc d that contains u and v but no other vertex of G that is within k hops from u or v.The study of these graphs was recently motivated by topology control for wireless networks [6,7]. We obtain the following results: (i) We prove that if G is a D1-graph on n vertices, then it has O(n3/2) edges. (ii) We show that for any n there exist D1-graphs with n vertices and Ω(n4/3) edges. (iii) We prove that if G is a D2-graph on n vertices, then it has O(n) edges. This bound is worst-case asymptotically tight. As an application of the first result, we show that: (iv) The maximum size of a family of pairwise non-overlapping lenses in an arrangement of $n$ unit circles in the plane is O(n3/2).The first two results improve the best previously known upper and lower bounds of $O(n^ 5/3 )$ and $\Omega(n)$ respectively (see \cite KL03 ). The third result improves the best previously known upper bound of O(n log n ) ([6]). Finally, our last result improves the best previously known upper bound (for the more general case of not necessarily unit circles) of O(n3/2 κ(n)) (see [1] ), where κ(n) = (log n ) O(α2(n)) and where α(n) is the extremely slowly growing inverse Ackermann's function.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
N. Alon, H. Last, R. Pinchasi and M. Sharir, On the complexity of arrangements of circles in the plane, Discrete Comput. Geom., 26 (2001), 465--492.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
S. Kapoor and X.Y. Li, Proximity structures for geometric graphs, International Journal of Computational Geometry and Applications, (2003), to appear.
 
7
X.Y. Li, G. Calinescu and P.J. Wan, Distributed construction of a planar spanner and routing for ad-hoc wireless networks, in 21st Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM). Volume 3. (2002)
 
8
 
9
J. Pach and P.K. Agarwal, it Combinatorial Geometry, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY 1995.
 
10
11
 
12
H. Tamaki and T. Tokuyama, How to cut pseudo-parabolas into segments, Discrete Comput. Geom. 19 (1998), 265--290.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Rom Pinchasi: colleagues
Shakhar Smorodinsky: colleagues

Peer to Peer - Readers of this Article have also read: