skip to main content
10.1145/3610543.3626155acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagessiggraph-asiaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Training Orchestral Conductors in Beating Time

Published:28 November 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

Orchestral conducting involves a rich vocabulary of gestures and so training conductors is challenging. We discuss how virtual reality and gesture detection could be used to aid this process. We describe our pilot interface for training conductors in basic beat patterns, using gestural input and virtual reality output. We investigated both positional and acceleration-based detection of beats, concluding that that the best way to detect beats reliably is to identify maxima in acceleration, that is, those moments in a beat that would appear as a flick to a human player. This practical evidence supports Wöllner’s theory of how human players detect beats. We trialled our system with novices and experts, with a range of beating styles.

References

  1. J. O. Borchers. 1997. WorldBeat: Designing a baton-based interface for an interactive music exhibit. In SIGCHI. ACM, 131–138.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. O. Borchers, W. Samminger, and M. Muhlhauser. 2002. Personal Orchestra: conducting audio/video music recordings. In Proc. WEDELMUSIC. IEEE, 93–100.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. P.B. Braem and T. Bräm. 2000. A pilot study of the expressive gestures used by classical orchestral conductors. In The signs of language revisited, Karen Emmorey and Harlan L. Lane (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 143–167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. C. Demiralp, C.D. Jackson, D.B. Karelitz, S. Zhang, and D.H. Laidlaw. 2006. CAVE and fishtank virtual-reality displays: A qualitative and quantitative comparison. IEEE TVCG 12, 3 (2006), 323–330.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Harold Farberman. 1997. The Art of Conducting Technique: A New Perspective. Alfred Music Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. P. Fleming, C. Young, S. Dixon, and M Carré. 2010. Athlete and coach perceptions of technology needs for evaluating running performance. Sports Engineering 13, 1 (2010), 1–18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Benjamin Grosbayne. 1973. Techniques of Modern Orchestral Conducting. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Robert T Hays, John W Jacobs, Carolyn Prince, and Eduardo Salas. 1992. Flight simulator training effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Military Psychology 4, 2 (1992), 63–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Alexander Refsum Jensenius. 2017. 2014: to gesture or not? An analysis of terminology in NIME proceedings 2001–2013. A NIME Reader: Fifteen Years of New Interfaces for Musical Expression (2017), 451–464.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Geoff Luck and Sol Nte. 2008. An investigation of conductors’ temporal gestures and conductor—musician synchronization, and a first experiment. Psychology of Music 36, 1 (2008), 81–99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Geoff Luck and John A Sloboda. 2009. Spatio-temporal cues for visually mediated synchronization. Music Perception 26, 5 (2009), 465–473.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Geoff Luck and Petri Toiviainen. 2006. Ensemble musicians’ synchronization with conductors’ gestures: An automated feature-extraction analysis. Music Perception 24, 2 (2006), 189–200.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. B McElheran. 1989. Conducting Technique: for Beginners and Professionals (rev. ed.). Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kenton O’Hara, Richard Harper, Helena Mentis, Abigail Sellen, and Alex Taylor. 2013. On the naturalness of touchless: putting the “interaction” back into NUI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 20, 1 (2013), 1–25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Prabhat, A. Forsberg, M. Katzourin, K. Wharton, and M. Slater. 2008. A comparative study of desktop, fishtank, and cave systems for the exploration of volume rendered confocal data sets. IEEE TVCG 14, 3 (2008), 551–563.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Edwin Roxburgh. 2014. Conducting for a new era. The Boydell Press, Woodbridge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. M Rudolf. 1950. The Grammar of Conducting. Schirmer Books, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. S. Schertenleib, M. Gutiérrez, F. Vexo, and D. Thalmann. 2004. Conducting a virtual orchestra. IEEE MultiMedia 11, 3 (2004), 40–49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Christopher Seaman. 2013. Inside Conducting. University Rochester Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. J. Segen, J. Gluckman, and S. Kumar. 2000. Visual interface for conducting virtual orchestra. In ICPR. IEEE, 276–279.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Clemens Wöllner and Wolfgang Auhagen. 2008. Perceiving conductors’ expressive gestures from different visual perspectives. An exploratory continuous response study. Music Perception 26, 2 (2008), 129–143.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. C. Wöllner, F. J. A. Deconinck, J. Parkinson, M. J. Hove, and P. E. Keller. 2012. The perception of prototypical motion: Synchronization is enhanced with quantitatively morphed gestures of musical conductors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38, 6 (2012), 1390–1403.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Training Orchestral Conductors in Beating Time

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SA '23: SIGGRAPH Asia 2023 Technical Communications
      November 2023
      127 pages
      ISBN:9798400703140
      DOI:10.1145/3610543

      Copyright © 2023 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 28 November 2023

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate178of869submissions,20%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)36
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format