skip to main content
10.1145/1028630.1028642acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesassetsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

UMA: a system for universal mathematics accessibility

Published:01 September 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

We describe the UMA system, a system developed under a multi-institution collaboration for making mathematics universally accessible. The UMA system includes translators that freely inter-convert mathematical documents transcribed in formats used by unsighted individual (Nemeth, Marburg) to those used by sighted individuals (LaTeX, Math-ML, OpenMath) and vice versa. The UMA system also includes notation-independent tools for aural navigation of mathematics. In this paper, we give an overview of the UMA system and the techniques used for realizing it.

References

  1. M. Batusic et al. Access to mathematics for the Blind. In International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs, Linz, Austria, pp. 609--616, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Braille Authority of North America. English Braille, American edition, 1994 revision.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. O. Caprotti et al. The OpenMath Standard 1.0. Technical Report, The OpenMath Consortium, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. D. Carlisle. DSSSL Style Sheet for MathML.Technical Report, The OpenMath Consortium, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Carlisle et al. Mathematical Markup Language. Working Draft, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Duxbury Systems. MegaMath Translator for MegaDots. www.duxburysystems.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H. Epheser, D. Pograniczna, and K. Britz Internationale Mathematikschrift fur Blinde, Deutsche Blindenstudienanstalt, Marburg (Lahn) 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. J.A. Gardner, et al. TRIANGLE: A Practical Application of Non-Speech Audio for Imparting Information. In Conference on Auditory Display, San Francisco, CA, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. H-F. Guo. Translating Nemeth Code to LaTeX: A Semantics-based Approach. Master's thesis. 1999. New Mexico State University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H-F. Guo et al. Computer Processing of Nemeth Braille Math Code. International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs. OCG Press, pp. 267--272, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Karshmer, G. Gupta, S. Geiger, and C Weaver. eading and writing mathematics: The MAVIS Project. Behavior and Information Technology, 18(1):2--10, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. L. Lamport.LaTeX: A Document Preparation System. Addison-Wesley Company, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Miesenberger, M. Batusic, B. Stäger LABRADOOR: LATEX-to-Braille-Door Le Labradoor (LATEX-to-Braille-Door): une passerelle du LATEX au Braille, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. A. Nemeth. The Nemeth Braille Code for Mathematics and Science Notation 1972 Revision. American Printing House for the Blind, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. T. V. Raman. Audio System for Technical Readings. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. L. Sterling, S. Shapiro. The Art of Prolog. MIT Press, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. J. Wielemaker, A C++ Interface to SWI Prolog, 2002, www.swi-prolog.org/packages/pl2cpp.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. UMA: a system for universal mathematics accessibility

                      Recommendations

                      Reviews

                      Edouard J. Desautels

                      The universal mathematics accessibility (UMA) system includes translators that freely convert mathematical documents transcribed in formats used by unsighted individuals to those used by sighted individuals, and vice versa. Many unsighted individuals are trained in the use of Braille, a six-bit code that was developed well before the computer age to handle literary or plain text. Braille does not lend itself to the encoding of mathematical expressions, particularly those that involve two dimensions. Thus, a form of Braille called Nemeth evolved in the US, and another called Marburg evolved in Germany. These codes support the encoding of mathematics. The mathematics most sighted individuals read more often than not has been encoded in one of these markup notations: LaTeX, Math-ML, or OpenMath. The UMA system has two subsystems: an interconversion platform (IP) and the navigation platform. IP provides transition between the digital formats for mathematics that were previously noted, as well as Braille-based formats. The interoperability is based on the use of a common interchange format (CIF), used to bridge between any pair of formats. The second subsystem is employed to provide interactive visual and aural output of mathematical entities; the navigation relies on the representation of the expressions in the CIFs. For unsighted individuals, useful outputs could be either Nemeth or Marburg encodings, or aural (spoken) renditions. A sighted individual not familiar with Nemeth or Marburg could nonetheless "read" such encodings, thanks to UMA's ability to produce equivalent print or aural output. The handling of two-dimensional objects, such as matrices encoded using Nemeth, requires user intervention. For instance, spatial arithmetic/algebra must be enclosed by the user with @@@-@@@ symbols. The authors believe it is quite reasonable to require users to enclose different parts of the document within special symbols, because the goal of the UMA system is not to convert legacy mathematical documents, rather it is to enable students and scholars of mathematics to communicate with their sighted counterparts. The UMA system is very much under continuous development, by multiple institutions. Techniques are being investigated to incorporate its various subsystems with the industry standard VoiceXML (an Extensible Markup Language (XML)-based notation for marking up aural documents) to provide interactive navigation. Online Computing Reviews Service

                      Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

                      Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

                      Comments

                      Login options

                      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                      Sign in
                      • Published in

                        cover image ACM Conferences
                        Assets '04: Proceedings of the 6th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
                        October 2004
                        202 pages
                        ISBN:158113911X
                        DOI:10.1145/1028630
                        • cover image ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing
                          ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing Just Accepted
                          Sept. 2003 - Jan. 2004
                          192 pages
                          ISSN:1558-2337
                          EISSN:1558-1187
                          DOI:10.1145/1029014
                          Issue’s Table of Contents

                        Copyright © 2003 ACM

                        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                        Publisher

                        Association for Computing Machinery

                        New York, NY, United States

                        Publication History

                        • Published: 1 September 2003

                        Permissions

                        Request permissions about this article.

                        Request Permissions

                        Check for updates

                        Qualifiers

                        • Article

                        Acceptance Rates

                        Assets '04 Paper Acceptance Rate25of47submissions,53%Overall Acceptance Rate436of1,556submissions,28%

                      PDF Format

                      View or Download as a PDF file.

                      PDF

                      eReader

                      View online with eReader.

                      eReader