ABSTRACT
Email consumes significant time and attention in the workplace. We conducted an organizational survey to understand how and why people attend to incoming email messages. We examined people's ratings of message importance and the actions they took on specific email messages, based on message characteristics and characteristics of receivers and senders. Respondents kept half of their new messages in the inbox and replied to about a third of them. They rated messages as important if they were about work and required action. Importance, in turn, had a modest impact on whether people replied to their incoming messages and whether they saved them. The results indicate that factors other than message importance (e.g., their social nature) also determine how people handle email. Overall, email usage reflects attentional differences due both to personal propensities and to work demands and relationships.
- Abu-Hakima, S., McFarland, C., & Meech, J.F. An agent-based system for email highlighting. in Proc. AGENTS 2001, ACM Press (2001), 224--225. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bälter, O. Keystroke level analysis of email message organization. In Proc. CHI 2000, ACM Press (2000), 105--112. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Belloti, V., Ducheneaut, N., Howard, M., & Smith, I. Taking email to task: The design and evaluation of a task management centered email tool. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 345--352. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boone, G. Concept features in Re:Agent, an intelligent email agent. In Proc. AGENTS 1998, ACM Press (1998), 141--148. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cohen, W., Carvalho, V., & Mitchell, T. Learning to classify email into "Speech Acts." In Proc. EMNLP-2004, (2004), 309--316.Google Scholar
- Dabbish, L., Venolia, G., & Cadiz, J.J. Marked for deletion: An analysis of email data. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 924--925. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ducheneaut, N., & Belloti, V. Email as habitat: An exploration of embedded personal information management. Interactions 8,5 (2001), 30--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Firm bans email at work, http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/internet/09/19/e-mail.ban/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
- Flores, F., Graves, M., Hartfield, B., & Winograd, T. Computer systems and the design of organizational interaction. ACM Transactions on OIS 6, 2 (1988), 153--172. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Horvitz, E., Jacobs, A., & Hovel, D. Attention-sensitive alerting. In Proc. UAI 1999, Morgan Kaufmann (1999), 305--313. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackson, T. W., Dawson, R. J., & Wilson, D. The cost of email interruption. Journal of Systems and Information Technology 5,1 (2001), 81--92.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kraut, R.E. & Attewell, P. Media use in a global corporation: Electronic mail and organizational knowledge, in Culture of the Internet. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, (1997), 323--342.Google Scholar
- Lashkari, Y., Metral, M., & Maes, P. Collaborative interface agents. In Proc. AAAI 1994. ACM Press (1994), 444--449. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mackay, W. Diversity in the use of electronic mail: A preliminary inquiry. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 6,4 (1988), 380--397. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Malone, T., Grant, K., Turbank, F., Brobst, S., & Cohen, M. Intelligent information-sharing systems. Communications of the ACM 30, 5 (1987), 390--402. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mintzberg, H. The Nature of Managerial Work. New Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA, 1973.Google Scholar
- Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., Isaacs, E., Creech, M., Johnson, J., & Hainsworth, J. Integrating communication and information through ContactMap. Communications of the ACM 45 (2002), 89--95. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neuwirth, C.M., Morris, J.H., Regli, S.H., Chandok, R., & Wegner, G.C. Envisioning communication: Task-tailorable representations of communication in asynchronous work. In Proc. CSCW 1998, ACM Press (1998), 265--274. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Panko, R. Managerial communication patterns. Journal of Organisational Computing 2, 1 (1992), 95--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sahami, M., Dumais, S., Heckerman, D., & Horvitz, E. (1998). A Bayesian approach to filtering junk email. AAAI Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, July 1998.Google Scholar
- Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sumner, M. The impact of electronic mail on managerial and organizational communications. In Proc. of ACM SIGOIS and IEEECS TCOA Conference on Office Information Systems. ACM Press (1988), 96--109. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tyler, J., & Tang, J. When can I expect an email response? A study of rhythms in email usage. In Proc. of ECSCW 2003, Oulu Univ. Press (2003), 238--258. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Venolia, G., Dabbish, L., Cadiz, J.J., & Gupta, A. (2001). Supporting email workflow. MSR Tech Report MSR-TR-2001-88.Google Scholar
- Vivisimo Clustering Engine, http://vivisimo.com/Google Scholar
- Whittaker, S., & Hirschberg, J. The character, value, and management of personal paper archives. ACM TOCHI 8, 2, (2001), 150--170. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Whittaker, S., & Sidner, C. Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In Proc. of CHI 1996, ACM Press (1996), 276--283. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
Understanding email use: predicting action on a message
Recommendations
Should I open this email?: inbox-level cues, curiosity and attention to email
CHI '11: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe quantity of email people receive each day can be overwhelming. Previous research suggests that when handling email, individuals prioritize certain messages for attention over others. Since people generally make this decision about which message to ...
Email overload at work: an analysis of factors associated with email strain
CSCW '06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative workAlmost every office worker can relate to feelings of email overload and stress, but in reality the concept of email strain is not well understood. In this paper, we describe a large-scale nationwide organizational survey examining the relationship ...
Marked for deletion: an analysis of email data
CHI EA '03: CHI '03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWhat characteristics of an email message make it more likely to be discarded? Statistical analyses of a set of deleted and non-deleted messages revealed several factors that were important in predicting the fate of a message. After controlling for the ...
Comments