skip to main content
article

WOODSS and the Web: annotating and reusing scientific workflows

Published:01 September 2005Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This paper discusses ongoing research on scientific workflows at the Institute of Computing, University of Campinas (IC - UNICAMP) Brazil. Our projects with bio-scientists have led us to develop a scientific workflow infrastructure named WOODSS. This framework has two main objectives in mind: to help scientists to specify and annotate their models and experiments; and to document collaborative efforts in scientific activities. In both contexts, workflows are annotated and stored in a database. This "annotated scientific workflow" database is treated as a repository of (sometimes incomplete) approaches to solving scientific problems. Thus, it serves two purposes: allows comparison of distinct solutions to a problem, and their designs; and provides reusable and executable building blocks to construct new scientific workflows, to meet specific needs. Annotations, moreover, allow further insight into methodology, success rates, underlying hypotheses and other issues in experimental activities.The many research challenges faced by us at the moment include: the extension of this framework to the Web, following Semantic Web standards; providing means of discovering workflow components on the Web for reuse; and taking advantage of planning in Artificial Intelligence to support composition mechanisms. This paper describes our efforts in these directions, tested over two domains - agro-environmental planning and bioinformatics.

References

  1. K. M. Anderson, R. N. Taylor, and E. J. Whitehead Jr. Chimera: hypermedia for heterogeneous software development environments. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 18(3):211--245, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. E. Bacarin, C. B. Medeiros, and E. Madeira. A Collaborative Model for Agricultural Supply Chains. In Proc COOPIS 2004, volume LNCS 3290, pages 319--336, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. T. J. Biggerstaff and C. Richter. Reusability framework, assessment, and directions, pages 1--17. ACM Press, 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. M. C. Cavalcanti, R. Targino, F. Baião, S. C. Rössle, P. M. Bisch, P. F. Pires, M. L. M. Campos, and M. Mattoso. Managing structural genomic workflows using Web services. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 53(1):45--74, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. L. A. Digiampietri, C. B. Medeiros, and J. C. Setubal. A framework based in Web services orchestration for bioinformatics workflow management. In Proc III Brazilian Workshop in Bioinformatics, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. A. J. G. Simpson et al. The genome sequence of the plant pathogen Xylella fastidiosa. Nature, 406(1):151--157, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. R. Fileto. The POESIA Approach for Services and Data Integration On the Semantic Web. PhD thesis, ICUNICAMP, Campinas-SP, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. R. Fileto, L. Liu, C. Pu, E. Assad, and C. B. Medeiros. POESIA: An Ontological Workflow Approach for Composing Web Services in Agriculture. VLDB Journal, 12(4):352--367, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. Ghallab, D. Nau, and P. Traverso. Automated Planning, Theory and Practice. Elsevier, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Proc. of the Workshop on Planning and Scheduling for Web and Grid Services, June 2004. http://www.isi.edu/ikcap/icaps04-workshop/ (as of 2005-07-11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Kaster, C. B. Medeiros, and H. Rocha. Supporting Modeling and Problem Solving from Precedent Experiences: The Role of Workflows and Case-Based Reasoning. Environmental Modeling and Software, 20:689--704, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. J. Kim and Y. Gil. Towards Interactive Composition of Semantic Web Services. In Proc. of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Semantic Web Services, march 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Oasis-Open. OASIS Web Services Business Process Execution Language Technical Committee. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home. php?wg_abbrev-wsbpel (as of 2005-07-11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Z. Pastorello Jr. Publication and Integration of Scientific Workflows on the Web. Master's thesis, UNICAMP, 2005. In Portuguese.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. G. Z. Pastorello Jr, C. B. Medeiros, S. Resende, and H. Rocha. Interoperability for GIS Document Management in Environmental Planning. Journal on Data Semantics, 3(LNCS 3534):100--124, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. A. Santanchè and C. B. Medeiros. Geographic Digital Content Components. In Proc. of VI Brazilian Symposium on GeoInformatics, November 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. A. Santanchè and C. B. Medeiros. Managing Dynamic Repositories for Digital Content Components. In EDBT 2004 Workshops, volume LNCS 3268/2004, pages 66--77, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. A. Santanchè and C. B. Medeiros. Self describing components: Searching for digital artifacts on the web. In Proc. of XX Brazilian Symp. on Databases, October 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. L Seffino, C. B. Medeiros, J. Rocha, and B. Yi. WOODSS - A Spatial Decision Support System based on Workflows. Decision Support Systems, 27(1-2):105--123, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. E. Sirin, B. Parsia, D. Wu, J. A. Hendler, and D. S. Nau. HTN planning for Web Service composition using SHOP2. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(4):377--396, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. R. D. Stevens, H. J. Tipney, C. J. Wroe, T. M. Oinn, M. Senger, P. W. Lord, C. A. Goble, A. Brass, and M. Tassabehji. Exploring Williams-Beuren syndrome using myGrid. Bioinformatics, 20(suppl_1):i303--310, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. The myGrid Consortium. myGrid: Middleware for in silico experiments in biology. http://www.mygrid.org.uk/ (as of 2005-07-11).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. J. Wainer, M. Weske, G. Vossen, and C. B. Medeiros. Scientific Workflow Systems. In Proc. of the NSF Workshop on Workflow and Process Automation Information Systems, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. WOODSS and the Web: annotating and reusing scientific workflows

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in

              Full Access

              • Published in

                cover image ACM SIGMOD Record
                ACM SIGMOD Record  Volume 34, Issue 3
                September 2005
                115 pages
                ISSN:0163-5808
                DOI:10.1145/1084805
                Issue’s Table of Contents

                Copyright © 2005 Authors

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 1 September 2005

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • article

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader