ABSTRACT
Zephyr is an expanding software company that developed a knowledge management system designed to support the work of employees and provide management overview. Despite strong management support the system was not much used and instead employees themselves developed a competing and much used parasitic system. First, we argue that the failure of the management's system is caused by the concept of knowledge upon which the system was built. Hence, design of computer systems is as much a question of critical conceptual understanding of its application domain as a question of doing ethnography and system development. Second, we argue that the process of design extends far into the process of use and that much can be learned by looking at the process of appropriation of a new system. The problems of conceptualisation and appropriation point towards the need to critically examine the mangle of practice in which artefacts, actors and organizations intertwine.
- Ackerman, M. S. Augmenting Organizational Memory: A Field Study of Answer Garden. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16 (3). 203--224. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ackerman, M. S. and Halvorsen, C. Organizational Memory: Processes, Boundary Objects, and Trajectories Proc. of HICSS'99, 1999, http://www.computer.org/ proceedings/hicss/0001/00011/00001toc.htm. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ackerman, M. S. and McDonald, D. Answer Garden 2: Merging Organizational Memory with Collaborative Help. Proc. of CSCW'98. 97--105. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andriessen, J. H. E., Hettinga, M. and Wulf, V. Evolving Use of Groupware. Special issue of Computer Supported Cooperative Work 12(2), 2003.Google Scholar
- Bannon, L. and Kuutti, K. Shifting Perspectives on Organizational Memory: From Storage to Active Remembering. Proc. of HICSS'96. 156--167. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barley, S. R. Technology as an Occasion for Structuring. Administration Science Quarterly, 31. 78--108.Google Scholar
- Bellotti, V. and Bly, S. Walking away from the Desktop Computer. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 209--218. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bertelsen, O. W. and Bødker, S. Cooperation in massively distributed Information Spaces. Proc. of ECSCW'01, Klüver, Netherlands, 2001, 1--17. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bijker, W. E. Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs. Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass) & London, 1995.Google Scholar
- Bowers, J., Button, G. and Sharrock, W. Workflow from Within and Without Proc. of ECSCW'95, Klüwer, Dordrecht, 1995, 51--66. Google ScholarDigital Library
- DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M. S. Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organization Science, 5 (2). 121--147.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12 (4). 465--490. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dourish, P. Process Description as Organisational Accounting Devices: the Dual use of Workflow Technologies. Proc. of GROUP'01, ACM Press, New York, 2001, 52--60. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fahay, L. and Prusak, L. The Eleven Deadliest Sins of Knowledge Management. California Management Review, 40 (3). 265--276.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Fischer, G. and Giaccardi, E. Meta-Design: A Framework for the Future of End User Development in Lieberman, H., Paternò, F. and Wulf, V. eds. End User Development - Empowering People to Flexibly Employ Advanced Information and Communication Technology, Klüwer, Dordrecht, 2005, in press.Google Scholar
- Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. Design at Work. Cooperative Design of Computer Systems. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, London, 1991. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grinter, R. E. q. Workflow Systems: Occasions for Success and Failure. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9. 189--214. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Grudin, J. Why CSCW Applications Fail: Problems in the Design and Evaluation of Organizational Interfaces. Proc. of CSCW'88. 85--93. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahler, H., Mørch, A., Stiemerling, O. and Wulf, V. Tailorable Systems and Cooperative Work. Special Issue of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 9(1), 2000.Google Scholar
- Karsten, H. Constructing Interdependencies with Collaborative Information Technology. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12 (4). 437--464. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Karsten, H. and Jones, M. The Long and Winding Road: Collaborative IT and Organisational Change. Proc. of CSCW'98, ACM, Seattle, 1998, 29--38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Latour, B. Technology is Society made Durable. in Law, J. ed. A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London & New York, 1991, 103--131.Google Scholar
- Luff, P. and Heath, C. Mobility in Collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 305--314. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miller, F. J. I = 0 (Information Has No Intrinsic Meaning). at http://www.fernstar.com.au/publications/papers/i=o.htmGoogle Scholar
- Mørch, A., Stevens, G., Won, M., Klann, M., Dittrich, Y. and Wulf, V. Component-based technologies for end-user development. Communications of the ACM, 47 (9). 59--62. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nichols, F. The Knowledge in Knowledge Management. in Cortada, J. W. and Woods, J. A. eds. The Knowledge Management Yearbook 2000--2001, Butterworth-Heinemann., Boston, 2000, 12--21.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W. J. Action and Artifact: the Structuring of Technologies-in-Use, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W. J. Evolving with Notes. in Ciborra, C. ed. Groupware and Teamwork, Wiley, Chichester, 1996, 23--60.Google Scholar
- Orlikowski, W. J. Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time: A Situated Change Perspective. Information Systems Research 7(1), 63--92.Google Scholar
- Pickering, A. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995.Google Scholar
- Pipek, V. and Wulf, V. Pruning the Answer Garden: Knowledge Sharing in Maintenance Engineering. Proc. of ECSCW'03, Klüver, Netherlands, 2003, 1--20. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1958.Google Scholar
- Prinz, W., Mark, G. and Pankoke-Babatz, U. Designing Groupware for Congruency in Use. in Proc.of CSCW'98, 1998, 373--382. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rogers, Y. Exploring Obstacles: Integrating CSCW in Evolving Organisations. Proc. of CSCW'94. 67--77. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Schuler, D. and Namioka, A. (eds.). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates., Hillsdale, NJ, 1993. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Star, S. L. The Sociology of the Invisible. in Maines, D. ed. Social Organization and Social Process, Aldine de Gruyter., Hawthorne, NY, 1991, 265--283.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. Located Accountabilities in Technology Production. Department of Sociology, Lancaster University, at http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/soc039ls.html.Google Scholar
- Suchman, L. Making Work Visible. Communications of the ACM, 38 (9). 56--63. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Suchman, L. Plans and Situated Actions. The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sutcliffe, A. Scenario-based Requirements Engineering. in RE'03 Proceedings, IEEE, Monterey Bay, California, 2003, 320--329. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sutcliffe, A. and Mehandjiev, N. Special Issue on End-User Development: Tools that Empower Users to Create their Own Software Solutions. Communications of the ACM, 47 (9). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sveiby, K. E. What is knowledge management? Brisbane, Sveiby Knowledge Associates. at: http://www.sveiby.com/faq.html#Whatis.Google Scholar
- Takeuchi, H. and Nonaka, I. Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. in Morey, D., Maybuny, M. and Thuraisingham, B. eds. Knowledge Management: Classic and Contemporary Works, MIT Press, Cambridge (Mass) & London, 2000, 139--182.Google Scholar
- Törpel, B., Pipek, V. and Rittenbruch, M. Creating Heterogeneity. Evolving Use of Groupware in a Network of Freelancers. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 12. 381--409. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Walsh, J. P. and Ungson, G. R. Organizational Memory. Academy of Management Review, 16 (1). 57--91.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wilson, T. D. The Nonsense of 'Knowledge Management'. Information Research, 8 (1). paper no. 144. {Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/148141/paper144.html}.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Observed Appropriation of IoT Technology: A Semiotic Account
IHC '18: Proceedings of the 17th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe Internet of Things (IoT) is an emerging technology powered by smart devices that increasingly pervades our environments and practices. The process of incorporating technology into one's practices involves use and adaptation of the technology and is ...
Collaborative Appropriation: How Couples, Teams, Groups and Communities Adapt and Adopt Technologies
CSCW '16 Companion: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing CompanionPrevious workshops examined how individual users adopt and adapt technologies to meet local needs, “completing design through use.” However, there has been little systematic study of how groups engage collaboratively in these activities. This workshop ...
Enactive appropriation
The appropriation of digital artefacts involves their use, which has changed, evolved or developed beyond their original design. Thus, to understand appropriation, we must understand use. We define use as the active, purposive exploitation of the ...
Comments