skip to main content
10.1145/1095034.1095063acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesuistConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Preference elicitation for interface optimization

Published:23 October 2005Publication History

ABSTRACT

Decision-theoretic optimization is becoming a popular tool in the user interface community, but creating accurate cost (or utility) functions has become a bottleneck --- in most cases the numerous parameters of these functions are chosen manually, which is a tedious and error-prone process. This paper describes ARNAULD, a general interactive tool for eliciting user preferences concerning concrete outcomes and using this feedback to automatically learn a factored cost function. We empirically evaluate our machine learning algorithm and two automatic query generation approaches and report on an informal user study.

References

  1. M. Agrawala and C. Stolte. Rendering effective route maps: Improving usability through generalization. In SIGGRAPH'01, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. Arnauld. The Art of Thinking. The Bobbs-Merrill Company, inc., 1662.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. G. J. Badros, A. Borning, and J. Stuckey. The Cassowary Linear Arithmetic Constraint Solving Algorithm. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 8(4), 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. C. Boutilier. A POMDP formulation of preference elicitation problems. In AAAI/IAAI, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Boutilier, R. Patrascu, P. Poupart, and D. Schuurmans. Constraint-based optimization with the minimax decision criterion. In International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. C. J. C. Burges. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 2(2):121--167, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. U. Chajewska and D. Koller. Utilities as random variables: Density estimation and structure discovery. In UAI, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. U. Chajewska, D. Koller, and D. Ormoneit. Learning an agent's utility function by observing behavior. In ICML'01, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. U. Chajewska, D. Koller, and R. Parr. Making rational decisions using adaptive utility elicitation. In AAAI/IAAI, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Fogarty, J. Forlizzi, and S. E. Hudson. Aesthetic information collages: generating decorative displays that contain information. In UIST, New York, NY, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Fogarty and S. E. Hudson. GADGET: A toolkit for optimization-based approaches to interface and display generation. In UIST'03, Vancouver, Canada, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. K. Gajos, D. Christianson, R. Hoffmann, T. Shaked, K. Henning, J. J. Long, and D. S. Weld. Fast and robust interface generation for ubiquitous applications. In Proceedings of Ubicomp'05, Tokyo, Japan, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. K. Gajos and D. S. Weld. Supple: automatically generating user interfaces. In IUI'04, Funchal, Madeira, Portugal, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. M. T. Gervasio, M. D. Moffitt, M. E. Pollack, J. M. Taylor, and T. E. Uribe. Active preference learning for personalized calendar scheduling assistance. In IUI '05, New York, NY, USA, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. D. Heckerman, E. Horvitz, and B. Middleton. An approximate nonmyopic computation for value of information. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 15(3):292--298, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. E. Horvitz. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In CHI '99, New York, NY, USA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. E. Horvitz and J. Apacible. Learning and reasoning about interruption. In International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. E. Horvitz, A. Jacobs, and D. Hovel. Attention-sensitive alerting. In UAI-99, San Francisco, CA, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. E. Horvitz, P. Koch, and J. Apacible. Busybody: creating and fielding personalized models of the cost of interruption. In CSCW '04, New York, NY, USA, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley and Sons, 1976. Republished in 1993 by Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Linden, S. Hanks, and N. Lesh. Interactive assessment of user preference models: The automated travel assistant. In User Modeling '97, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. T. P. Minka. Expectation propagation for approximate bayesian inference. In UAI '01, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2001. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. P. Pu, B. Faltings, and M. Torrens. User-involved preference elicitation. In IJCAI'03 Workshop on Configuration, Acapulco, Mexico, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. G. Schohn and D. Cohn. Less is more: Active learning with support vector machines. In ICML, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. S. Shearin and H. Lieberman. Intelligent profiling by example. In IUI '01, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. S. Tong and D. Koller. Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:45--66, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. M. X. Zhou and V. Aggarwal. An optimization-based approach to dynamic data content selection in intelligent multimedia interfaces. In UIST '04, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. M. X. Zhou, Z. Wen, and V. Aggarwal. A graph-matching approach to dynamic media allocation in intelligent multimedia interfaces. In IUI '05, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Preference elicitation for interface optimization

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        UIST '05: Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
        October 2005
        270 pages
        ISBN:1595932712
        DOI:10.1145/1095034

        Copyright © 2005 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 October 2005

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        UIST '05 Paper Acceptance Rate31of159submissions,19%Overall Acceptance Rate842of3,967submissions,21%

        Upcoming Conference

        UIST '24

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader