Two-D or not Two-D: gender implications of visual cognition in electronic games

ABSTRACT

Are there repercussions from 3D graphics being used in the majority of current video games? This research investigates whether the use of 2D and 3D graphics in video games affect the extent of how attracted a male is to playing an electronic game versus how attracted a female is. Published research indicates males outperform women in 3D virtual environments; this research illustrates that gender has an influence on how attracted an individual is to an electronic game. Over the course of two weeks participants took part in a study to assess whether 2D and 3D video games attract females and males differently. A multimethod (quantitative and qualitative) research design was used analogous to that of Sedig et al. [2001]. Data collection included various measures and approaches for cross-validation. Results indicate that if an electronic game is to appeal to the majority of female players, the game should be 2D, easy, and fun; if the game is to appeal to the majority of male players, the game should be 3D, challenging, and fun.

References

1. Aguilera, M., and Mendiz, A. 2003. Video games and education (Education in the face of a "parallel school"). ACM Computers in Entertainment 1, 1 (October).
2. Baker, R. S., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., and Wagner, A. Z. 2004. Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor class-room: When students "game the system". In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI 2004, 383--390.
3. Beato, G. 1997. Girl games: Computer games for girls is no longer an oxymoron. Wired Magazine (April). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/5.04/es_girlgames.html.
4. Camp, T. 1997. The incredible shrinking pipeline. Communications of the ACM 40, 10 (October), 103--110.
5. Carey, B., 2005. Men and women really do think differently. LiveScience, January. http://livescience.com/humanbiology/050120_brain_sex.html.
6. Czerwinski, M., Tan, D. S., and Robertson, G. G. 2002. Women take a wider view. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI 2002, vol. 4, 195--202.
7. Durkin, K., and Barber, B. 2002. Not so doomed: Computer game play and positive adolescent development. Applied Developmental Psychology 23, 373--392.
8. Fennema, E., 2000. Gender and mathematics: What is known and what do i wish was known? Paper presented at the Fifth Annual Forum of the National Institute for Science Education. Detroit, MI.
9. Flanagan, M. 2000. Navigating the narrative in space: gender and spatiality in virtual worlds. Art Journal. Fall.
10. Funk, J. B., 2001. Girls just want to have fun. Paper presented at Playing by the Rules: Video Games and Cultural Policy. University of Chicago, IL, Oct. 26--27.
11. Gurer, D., and Camp, T. 2002. An ACM-W literature review on women in computing. Inroads: ACM SIGCSE Journal 34, 2, 121--127.
12. Hackett, T. C., 2001. Designing educational computer experiences that are positive, meaningful, and engaging. Paper presented at Playing by the Rules: Video Games and Cultural Policy. University of Chicago, IL, Oct. 26--27.
13. Hafner, K. 2004. What do women game designers want? New York Times (October 14). Technology section.
14. Inkpen, K., Upitis, R., Klawe, M., Lawry, J., Anderson, A., Ndunda, M., Sedighian, K., Leroux, S., and Hsu, D. 1994. We have never forgetful flowers in our garden: Girls' responses to electronic games. Journal of Computers in Math and Science Teaching.
15. Interactive Digital Software Association. 2002. Essential Facts About the Computer and Video Game Industry. http://www.theesa.com/pressroom.html.
16. Jenkins, H., 2001. From barbie to mortal kombat: Further reflections. Paper presented at Playing by the Rules: Video Games and Cultural Policy. University of Chicago, IL, Oct. 26--27.
17. Kahn, K. 1996. Drawings on napkins, video-game animation, and other ways to program computers. Communications of the ACM 39, 9 (August).
18. Kiesler, S., Sproull, L., and Eccles, J. S. 2002. Pool halls, chips, and war games: Women in the culture of computing. Inroads SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2 (June), 159--164.
19. Klawe, M. M., 2004. Personal interview, July.
20. Klawe, M. M., 2005. Increasing the number of women majoring in CS: what works? Presented at ACM SIGCSE 2005 Symposium, St. Louis, MO, Feb. 23--27. www.princeton.edu/seasweb/dean/Klawe/SIGCSE_2005.pdf.
21. Lane, L. L. 2001. Sex differences. Gale Encyclopedia of Psychology.
22. Lawton, C. A., and Morrin, K. A. 1999. Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer-simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research (January).
23. Murray, M., and Kliman, M. 1999. Beyond point and click: The search for gender equity in computer games. ENC focus 6, 3, 23--27.
24. Project64. 2005. Nintendo 64 Emulator. http://www.pj64.net.
25. Rosenblum, J. 1997. Through the glass wall. In Hands On!, TERC, Cambridge, MA.
26. Rouse, R. 1998. Do computer games need to be 3D? ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics 32, 2, 64--66.
27. Rubin, A., O'Neil, K., Murray, M., and Ashley, J., 1997. What kind of educational computer games would girls like? Paper presented at AERA. http://www.terc.edu/mathequity/gw/html/MITpaper.html.
28. Sedig, K., Klawe, M., and Westrom, M. 2001. Role of interface manipulation style and scaffolding on cognition and concept learning in learnware. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCHI 2001, vol. 8, 34--59.
29. Vail, K., 1997. Girlware: Software companies are targeting girls, but is their marketing on the mark? Electronic School. http://www.electronicschool.com/0697f1.html.
30. Weil, E., 1997. The girl-game jinx. Salon - 21st. http://archive.salon.com/21st/feature/1997/12/cov_10feature.html.

Index Terms

• Human-centered computing

  • Human computer interaction (HCI)