skip to main content
10.1145/1124772.1124894acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Being watched or being special: how I learned to stop worrying and love being monitored, surveilled, and assessed

Published: 22 April 2006 Publication History

Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between display of feedback (public vs. private) and the basis for evaluation (present vs. absent) of that feedback. Using a controlled, laboratory setting, we employ a fundamentally social, interpersonal context (speed-dating). Two participants (one male and one female) receive real-time performance feedback about either only themselves (private) or about both participants (public). We measure participant perceptions of monitoring, conformity, and self-consciousness about themselves and their dating partner. We also assess perceptions of system invasiveness, system competence, and system support. Results reveal a consistent pattern of significant interaction between feedback display and basis for evaluation conditions. In each of these interactions, public feedback with an added, trivial, basis for evaluation creates significantly lower perception of monitoring, conformity, self-consciousness, and system invasiveness, than the other three conditions. Additionally there is a main effect for basis for evaluation with respect to system competence and supportiveness. In each case, the presence of a basis produces more positive assessments than its absence. The experiment shows that reactions to being monitored and evaluated do not differ strictly along the dimension of public vs. private; basis for evaluation of feedback functions as a mediator and thus co-determines participant attitudinal responses. We discuss the implications of this at several levels, and present a broader cultural explanation in terms of the theory of rationalization. We also discuss the issues around and functionality of linking laboratory settings to larger cultural contexts in this and related fields of inquiry.

References

[1]
Andrejevic, M. Reality TV: The work of being watched. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc, Lanham, MD, USA, 2004.]]
[2]
Bellotti, V. and Sellen, A. Designing for Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Environments. In Proc. ECSCW 1993, Kluwer Press (1993), 77--92.]]
[3]
Boyle, M., and Greenberg, S. The language of privacy: Learning from video media space analysis and design. TOCHI 2005, Kluwer Press (2005), 328--370.]]
[4]
Christians, C. and Carey, J.W. The logic and aims of qualitative research. In Stempel, G. and Westley, B. Research methods in mass communication. Prentice Hall, New York, NY, 354--374.]]
[5]
Dourish, P. Culture and control in a media space. In Proc. ECSCW 1993, ACM Press (1993).]]
[6]
Dourish, P., Harrison, S. Re-place-ing space: The role of place and space in collaborative systems. In Proc. CSCW 1996, ACM Press (1996).]]
[7]
Edwards, P. The Closed World: Computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., USA, 1996.]]
[8]
Gaver, B. The affordance of media spaces for collaboration. In Proc. CSCW 1992, ACM Press (1992), 17--24.]]
[9]
Geertz, C. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York, NY, 1973, pp 3 -- 30.]]
[10]
Grudin, J. Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. In Communications of the ACM, ACM Press (1994), 93--105.]]
[11]
Hong, J.I., Ng, J.D., Lederer, S., and Landay, J.A. Privacy risk models for designing privacy-sensitive ubiquitous computing systems. In Proc. DIS 2004, ACM Press (2004).]]
[12]
Huang, E. M. and Mynatt, E. D. Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 49--56.]]
[13]
Lampe, C., and Johnston, E. Net communities: Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community. In Proc. SIGGROUP 2005, ACM Press (2005).]]
[14]
Langer, E.J., Blank, A., and Chanowitz, B. The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of placebic information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36 (1978), 635--642.]]
[15]
Littler, C.R. Understanding Taylorism. In British Journal of Sociology (1978), 29, 185--207.]]
[16]
Morris, M.R., Morris, D., and Winograd, T. Individual audio channels with single display groupware: Effects on communication and task strategy. In Proc. CSCW 2004, ACM Press (2004), 242--251.]]
[17]
Paylen, L. Social, individual and technological issues for groupware calendar systems. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM press (1999), 17--24.]]
[18]
Stewart, J., Bederson, B.D., and Druin, A. Single-display groupware: A model for co-present collaboration. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 286--293.]]
[19]
Weber, M. The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1946.]]
[20]
Zuboff, S. In the age of the smart machine: The future of work and power. Basic Books, New York, NY, 1988.]]

Cited By

View all
  • (2022)One Rating to Rule Them All?Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3511808.3557410(768-779)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2022
  • (2020)Human-Robot InteractionEncyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_274-5(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2020
  • (2016)Could the Inherent Nature of the Internet of Things Inhibit Person-to-Person Connection?Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems10.1145/2908805.2909418(177-180)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2016
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Being watched or being special: how I learned to stop worrying and love being monitored, surveilled, and assessed

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '06: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2006
    1353 pages
    ISBN:1595933727
    DOI:10.1145/1124772
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 22 April 2006

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. computer-mediated communication
    2. evaluation
    3. feedback
    4. private
    5. public
    6. shared experience
    7. ubiquitous computing

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Conference

    CHI06
    Sponsor:
    CHI06: CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 22 - 27, 2006
    Québec, Montréal, Canada

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)17
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Mar 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2022)One Rating to Rule Them All?Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management10.1145/3511808.3557410(768-779)Online publication date: 17-Oct-2022
    • (2020)Human-Robot InteractionEncyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_274-5(1-23)Online publication date: 2-Jun-2020
    • (2016)Could the Inherent Nature of the Internet of Things Inhibit Person-to-Person Connection?Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems10.1145/2908805.2909418(177-180)Online publication date: 4-Jun-2016
    • (2015)Missing Photos, Suffering Withdrawal, or Finding Freedom? How Experiences of Social Media Non-Use Influence the Likelihood of ReversionSocial Media + Society10.1177/20563051156148511:2Online publication date: 3-Dec-2015
    • (2015)From Third to Surveilled PlaceProceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/2702123.2702574(1659-1668)Online publication date: 18-Apr-2015
    • (2014)Theoretical Importance of Contingency in Human-Computer InteractionCommunication Research10.1177/009365021453496243:5(595-625)Online publication date: 22-May-2014
    • (2013)Decision Making, Dashboard Displays, and Human Performance in Service SystemsInternational Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector10.4018/ijisss.20131001035:4(32-46)Online publication date: 1-Oct-2013
    • (2009)Supporting privacy by preventing misclosureCHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/1520340.1520448(3145-3148)Online publication date: 4-Apr-2009
    • (2009)Human Robot InteractionEncyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science10.1007/978-0-387-30440-3_274(4643-4659)Online publication date: 2009
    • (2008)Privacy in context: Privacy issues in Ubiquitous Computing applications2008 Third International Conference on Digital Information Management10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746842(827-837)Online publication date: Nov-2008

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media