Article

Using social agents to visualize software scenarios

Authors:

Thomas A. Alspaugh,

Bill Tomlinson,

Eric BaumerAuthors Info & Claims

SoftVis '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Software visualization

Pages 87 - 94

https://doi.org/10.1145/1148493.1148507

Published: 04 September 2006 Publication History

Abstract

Enabling nonexperts to understand a software system and the scenarios of usage of that system can be challenging. Visually modeling a collection of scenarios as social interactions can provide quicker and more intuitive understanding of the system described by those scenarios. This project combines a scenario language with formal structure and automated tool support (ScenarioML) and an interactive graphical game engine featuring social automomous characters and text-to-speech capabilities. We map scenarios to social interactions by assigning a character to each actor and entity in the scenarios, and animate the interactions among these as social interactions among the corresponding characters. The social interactions can help bring out these important aspects: interactions of multiple agents, pattern and timing of interactions, non-local inconsistencies within and among scenarios, and gaps and missing information in the scenario collection. An exploratory study of this modeling's effectiveness is presented.

References

[1]

Alexander, I. 2004. Introduction: Scenarios in system development. In Scenarios, Stories, Use Cases: Through the Systems Development Life-Cycle, I. F. Alexander and N. Maiden, Eds. John Wiley&Sons, Ltd., 3--24.

[2]

Alspaugh, T. A. 2006. Scenarios, business rules, and matching. Technical Report UCI-ISR-06-5, Institute for Software Research, University of California, Irvine.

[3]

Anonymous. 1998. Everyman. In Internet Medieval Source Book, P. Halsall, Ed. http://www.fordham.edu/HALSALL/basis/everyman.html.

[4]

Benner, K., Feather, M. S., Johnson, W. L., and Zor-Man, L. 1992. Utilizing scenarios in the software development process. In IFIP Working Group 8.1 Working Conference on Information Systems Development Processes.

Digital Library

[5]

Blumberg, B. 1996. Old Tricks, New Dogs: Ethology and Interactive Creatures. Media Laboratory, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

Digital Library

[6]

Byrne, R., and Whiten, A., Eds. 1988. Machiavellian Intelligence. Clarendon Press, Oxford.

[7]

Ciceronis, M. T., 55 B. C. De Oratore ad Quintum Fratrem, Liber II. http://www.forumromanum.org/literature/cicero_oratore2.html.

[8]

Downie, M. 2001. behavior, animation, music: the music and movement of synthetic characters. Media Arts&Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

[9]

Haumer, P., Pohl, K., and Weidenhaupt, K. 1998. Requirements elicitation and validation with real world scenes. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 24, 12 (Dec.), 1036--1054.

Digital Library

[10]

Marcus, A., Feng, L., and Maletic, J. I. 2003. 3D representations for software visualization. In SoftVis '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Software Visualization, 27--37.

Digital Library

[11]

Mateas, M. 1999. An Oz-centric review of interactive drama and believable agents. In Artificial Intelligence Today: Recent Trends and Developments, M. Wooldridge and M. Veloso, Eds., vol. 1600 of Lecture Notes in AI. 297--328.

Digital Library

[12]

Mayer, R. E. 2001. Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press.

Digital Library

[13]

Pang, T., Maiden, N., Zachos, K., and Ncube, C. 2005. Do rich media scenarios support requirements discovery? In 11th International Workship on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ'05), 152--166.

[14]

Perlin, K., and Goldberg, A. 1996. Improv: A system for scripting interactive actors in virtual worlds. In SIGGRAPH, 205--216.

Digital Library

[15]

Rosedale, P., 2006. Serious Games Summit keynote: You can (not) be serious. http://www.gamasutra.com/features/2006020/carless_01.shtml.

[16]

Ruthruff, J., Creswick, E., Burnett, M., Cook, C., Prabhakararao, S., M. Fisher, I., and Main, M. 2003. End-user software visualizations for fault localization. In SoftVis '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Software visualization, 123--132.

Digital Library

[17]

Tomlinson, B., Et Al. 2001. AlphaWolf. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2001: conference abstracts and applications.

[18]

Tomlinson, B., Downie, M., Berlin, M., Gray, J., Lyons, D., Cochran, J., and Blumberg, B. 2002. Leashing the AlphaWolves: Mixing user direction with autonomous emotion in a pack of semi-autonomous virtual characters. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Computer Animation (SCA-02), ACM Press, New York, S. N. Spencer, Ed., 7--14.

Digital Library

[19]

Tomlinson, B., Yau, M. L., O'Connell, J., Williams, K., and Yamaoka, S. 2005. The Virtual Raft Project: a mobile interface for interacting with communities of autonomous characters. In CHI Extended Abstracts, 1150--1151.

Digital Library

[20]

Tudoreanu, M. E. 2003. Designing effective program visualization tools for reducing user's cognitive effort. In SoftVis '03: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM symposium on Software visualization, 105--114.

Digital Library

[21]

Wood, D. P., Christel, M. G., and Stevens, S. M. 1994. A multimedia approach to requirements capture and modeling. In First International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE'94), 53--56.

[22]

Zachos, K., and Maiden, N. 2004. ART-SCENE: Enhancing scenario walkthroughs with multi-media scenarios. In 12th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE'04), 360--361.

Digital Library

[23]

Zachos, K., Maiden, N., and Tosar, A. 2005. Rich-media scenarios for discovering requirements. IEEE Software 22, 5 (Sept./Oct.), 89--97.

Digital Library

Cited By

Teyseyre ACampo M(2009)An Overview of 3D Software VisualizationIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2008.8615:1(87-105)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2008.86
Harel DSegall IKoschke RHundhausen CTelea A(2008)Visualizing inter-dependencies between scenariosProceedings of the 4th ACM symposium on Software visualization10.1145/1409720.1409744(145-153)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1409720.1409744
(2007)Clarity for StakeholdersProceedings of the 2007 Fifth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering10.1109/CERE.2007.3(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2007
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CERE.2007.3
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Using social agents to visualize software scenarios
1. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Designing software
      1. Requirements analysis

Recommendations

Classifying Scenarios with Differential Scenario
Proceedings of the 2008 conference on Knowledge-Based Software Engineering: Proceedings of the Eighth Joint Conference on Knowledge-Based Software Engineering

A visually classification method of scenarios using differential information between normal scenarios is presented. Behaviors of normal scenarios of similar purposes belonging to the same problem domain resemble each other. We derive the differential ...
Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents?: The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people's loneliness in human-robot interaction

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of physical embodiment in human-agent interaction. Experiment 1 (N=32) shows positive effects of physical embodiment on the feeling of an agent's social presence, the evaluation of the agent, the ...
A Generation Method of Exceptional Scenarios from a Normal Scenario

This paper proposes a method to generate exceptional scenarios from a normal scenario written with a scenario language. This method includes (1) generation of exceptional plans and (2) generation of exceptional scenario by a user's selection of these ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

SoftVis '06: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Software visualization

September 2006

199 pages

ISBN:1595934642

DOI:10.1145/1148493

General Chair:
Eileen Kraemer
The University of Georgia
,
Program Chairs:
Margaret Burnett
Oregon State University
,
Stephan Diehl
University Trier, Germany

Copyright © 2006 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 04 September 2006

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 20 of 65 submissions, 31%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

4
Total Citations
View Citations
591
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)4
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 07 Mar 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Teyseyre ACampo M(2009)An Overview of 3D Software VisualizationIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2008.8615:1(87-105)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2009
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/TVCG.2008.86
Harel DSegall IKoschke RHundhausen CTelea A(2008)Visualizing inter-dependencies between scenariosProceedings of the 4th ACM symposium on Software visualization10.1145/1409720.1409744(145-153)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2008
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1409720.1409744
(2007)Clarity for StakeholdersProceedings of the 2007 Fifth International Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering10.1109/CERE.2007.3(1-10)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2007
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CERE.2007.3
Alspaugh TBaumer ETomlinson B(2006)On a Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Social-Agent Scenario VisualizationProceedings of the Fourth Internationa Workshop on Comparative Evaluation in Requirements Engineering10.1109/CERE.2006.7(60-5)Online publication date: 11-Sep-2006
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/CERE.2006.7

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten